Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:56 PM Jun 2012

Supreme Court says union must give notice to nonmembers before collecting dues increase [View all]

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that unions must give nonmembers an immediate chance to object to unexpected fee increases or special assessments that all workers are required to pay in closed-shop situations.

The court ruled for Dianne Knox and other nonmembers of the Service Employees International Union’s Local 1000, who wanted to object and opt out of a $12 million special assessment the union required from its California public sector members for political campaigning. Knox and others said the union did not give them a legally required notice that the increase was coming.

The union, and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said the annual notice that the union gives was sufficient. The high court disagreed in a 7-2 judgment written by Justice Samuel Alito.

“When a public-sector union imposes a special assessment or dues increase, the union must provide a fresh ... notice and may not exact any funds from nonmembers without their affirmative consent,” Alito said.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-says-union-must-give-notice-to-nonmembers-before-collecting-dues-increase/2012/06/21/gJQAPKbksV_story.html

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sotomayor and Ginsburg voted with the majority bluestateguy Jun 2012 #1
With as sharply divided as this court has been... FBaggins Jun 2012 #3
It was 7-2 on the judgment. Seeking Serenity Jun 2012 #7
Sometimes the Unions give the other side all the ammunition they need. Bandit Jun 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #4
These weren't union members Seeking Serenity Jun 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #10
Agency shop Seeking Serenity Jun 2012 #16
My contract (AFSCME LOCAL 251) has a fair share provision Omaha Steve Jun 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #21
"special assessments for political funds" Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #11
There's a distinct difference between collective bargaining activities Seeking Serenity Jun 2012 #17
People should not be forced to give up their livelihoods over special assessments Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #20
I work for a cable company. My company christx30 Jun 2012 #12
Makes sense to me jade3000 Jun 2012 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #22
I never christx30 Jun 2012 #23
sounds fair to me madrchsod Jun 2012 #5
When I heard this I let out an OMG then NPR explained that it should be WTF underpants Jun 2012 #9
So when will stockholders be given the same rights? Joe Bacon Jun 2012 #13
Umm.. SnakeEyes Jun 2012 #14
Beck decision all over wobblie Jun 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court says union ...