Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LenaBaby61

(6,987 posts)
62. The polling sample...
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:49 PM
May 2016

IS also extremely small: 552, plus as you said there are 10% of the voters who are undecided, plus the poll has a Moe of 5.7% Not to say a smaller poll can't be accurate, but when you thrown in all of those things plus how the % of who were polled were polled.

Outlier poll just like the one in Oregon that said Hillary Clinton would beat Bernie Sanders in Oregon by 18 points.

Moving along, the truth rolls MrMickeysMom May 2016 #1
2nd cousin to the "Flying Fickle Finger of Fate"? n/t 24601 May 2016 #4
whatever, too late triron May 2016 #69
I see all you new posters like "LBN"... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #72
It sure isn't the 30% plus Sanders needs. still_one May 2016 #2
Patience... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #6
I live in California, and I was doing phone banking last weekend Those folks who have been still_one May 2016 #8
Yep! Many of those votes are already in the bank. LiberalFighter May 2016 #15
Let Me Guess...Another Clinton Group Member With Liberal In Their Name billhicks76 May 2016 #52
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Orrex May 2016 #60
Wow. Cant Even Point Out Something I Caught billhicks76 May 2016 #80
Alerting Orrex May 2016 #81
Have A Somber Memorial Day billhicks76 May 2016 #90
Count me in the unabashed, unapologetic, flaming, bleeding-heart group. libdem4life May 2016 #88
Thank You billhicks76 May 2016 #91
It isn't the win a frontrunner going to the convention needs either Omaha Steve May 2016 #24
Sure it is. Darb May 2016 #26
IF she can't get a convincing win in BLUE CA Omaha Steve May 2016 #28
Uhhhhh, is this a primary, or the election? Darb May 2016 #32
the ole Boogy Man will get me If i vote for hillary? Cryptoad May 2016 #38
Not the Boogy Man! ffr May 2016 #53
I believe the quote is inchhigh May 2016 #27
It is early Omaha Steve May 2016 #29
I've been on DU since 2004 but inchhigh May 2016 #40
Sanders could win by 40% and it wouldn't be enough. The nominee will be determined.... George II May 2016 #49
Do you see how nicely you've set up your belief system? Orrex May 2016 #59
How specifically has Clinton "cheated"? Do YOU see how nicely you've set up YOUR belief system? George II May 2016 #61
Oh please. Orrex May 2016 #63
Oh, I thought you were being serious. Of course she hasn't cheated.... George II May 2016 #64
Wait--we're on the same page?!? Orrex May 2016 #65
How are you calculating that? Samantha May 2016 #68
Are you new to this whole thing? GulfCoast66 May 2016 #73
Kind of -- I have only been a political junkie for 50 years now Samantha May 2016 #74
If white voters favor Clinton by 6 points, and Hispanics by 9, then why is she only ahead by 2? pnwmom May 2016 #3
When I did phone banking for Hillary last weekend, in that event, a most of the folks I spoke with still_one May 2016 #7
Since the vast majority of Californians are white or Hispanic, it seems odd pnwmom May 2016 #9
Survey USA a couple of days ago had Hillary 57, Sanders 39. A couple more polls would be nice to still_one May 2016 #13
It's sometimes hard to tell by last name who is Hispanic. cannabis_flower May 2016 #23
I agree. Also, it is purely anectodel, since the peple I was calling may not be a valid reflection still_one May 2016 #55
But I just don't get the math of this one. The gap between the candidates is pnwmom May 2016 #34
agree. a few more polls will give a tread. Much better. riversedge May 2016 #42
I've been a democrat for 14 years now. ThinkCritically May 2016 #83
This poll has a MOE of 5.7, about as big a MOE as I've ever seen in a poll. George II May 2016 #50
Interesting. I wonder what their turnout model was? (nt) Recursion May 2016 #5
As Eddie Izzard says. Bad Dog May 2016 #10
Except Sanders needs 100%, anything less is a loss for Sanders. Thinkingabout May 2016 #11
As Hillary is being hauled away in a paddy wagon, the super delegates will be scratching their heads Pauldg47 May 2016 #75
This will happen shortly after the FEC charges Sanders with campaign fund fraud, interesting Thinkingabout May 2016 #76
Ha....this would have been exposed big time monthes ago....I beg you to vote for the Bern!!!!! Pauldg47 May 2016 #77
It has been exposed, second letter listing donations which goes over the limit of $2700, guess some Thinkingabout May 2016 #78
It's all over the news. Pauldg47 May 2016 #82
Interesting that you care about that considering... ThinkCritically May 2016 #84
Yes, she has attended fund raisers for down ticket candidates, do you know how much Thinkingabout May 2016 #85
Call it, Skinner!!! Cooley Hurd May 2016 #12
If history is an indicator (with regard to polls in this election) Rafale May 2016 #14
The Hillary phone banks probably target voters who already have expressed a JDPriestly May 2016 #17
Thanks! Rafale May 2016 #18
I think it differs from county to county. JDPriestly May 2016 #20
Thank you for all the hard work you are doing Samantha May 2016 #87
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author Turbineguy May 2016 #16
There are relatively few Republicans in California. JDPriestly May 2016 #21
No wonder she zentrum May 2016 #19
maybe but not at previous debates. Mary Mac May 2016 #22
You trust Brit Hume? Chris Wallace is questionable as well. Anything on Faux is anti Democratic redstateblues May 2016 #30
Brit Hume is the WORST! Zen Democrat May 2016 #67
IOW Sanders loses... brooklynite May 2016 #25
Well, the argument can be made ... Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #36
But he can't... brooklynite May 2016 #45
It doesn't matter.. mountain grammy May 2016 #31
The numbers make no sense whatsoever: CrowCityDem May 2016 #33
Thank you! I asked this question above, but no one else seems to see the problem. pnwmom May 2016 #35
I didn't read every line of it, but I didn't see anything about that, no. CrowCityDem May 2016 #39
Hah,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #37
I thought she was eighteen points up only a few days ago. Gene Debs May 2016 #41
It could be the news of the recent State Department findings against her. forest444 May 2016 #43
We shall see what happens YankeeBravo May 2016 #44
I'll be right beside you chwaliszewski May 2016 #47
The Truth in black & White: Clinton=1705 Sanders=1414 (SNOPES) askeptic May 2016 #46
+1 chwaliszewski May 2016 #48
Yea like Oregon? One poll had Hillary up by 15 when all the others were Thekaspervote May 2016 #51
A win in California would make their work much more difficult. pa28 May 2016 #54
I wonder why people are ignoring the poll that came out the SAME day that shows.... George II May 2016 #56
You can believe Public Policy Institute of Cal or Washington Times askeptic May 2016 #57
I let a reputable organization like Project538 do the methodology assessment, and they find... George II May 2016 #58
The polling sample... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #62
Wha? Bernie was behind 18 points just last week! Zen Democrat May 2016 #66
Horrendous Optics for Hillary merkins May 2016 #70
We Donated to Sanders Again Yesterday McKim May 2016 #71
I live in So Cal. and see no enthusiasm for LibDemAlways May 2016 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #86
Keeping it kicked Amorka May 2016 #89
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #93
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #94
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #95
Kicking nt LiberalElite Jun 2016 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #97
Just joined in the middle of the night? LiberalElite Jun 2016 #98
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #99
"Dead heat" Bubry Jun 2016 #100
After the AP told Bernie voters to stay home... Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #101
Dead heat? She us ahead by double digits.... apcalc Jun 2016 #102
The AP's call for Hillary Clinton ruined California's election party--and here’s why that matters Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #103
Or Hillary supporters stayed home because she already won-- That fake outrage works both ways snooper2 Jun 2016 #105
Looks like the cards fell differently Vogon_Glory Jun 2016 #104
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: Clinton and Sanders...»Reply #62