Latest Breaking News

beastie boy

(9,915 posts)

45. That was the right wingers' hope, so they could damage the undamaged Bernie

Wed May 4, 2016, 05:10 PM

May 2016

much more than they were ever able to damage Hillary. And they have plenty of material for that.

But, mercifully for Bernie, this ain't happening.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

114 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Judge: Clinton may be ordered to testify in records case [View all] alp227 May 2016 OP

Now folks, this is important. Delay is not an option. N/T Paper Roses May 2016 #1

what does tom delay have to do with this? niyad May 2016 #4

Wow. I think that actually caused me some brain damage. RiverNoord May 2016 #84

Ha ha...' niyad' made a funny laserhaas May 2016 #114

Not looking good for Her Majesty. BillZBubb May 2016 #2

Heard this one for years. beastie boy May 2016 #34

Judicial Watch----Yawn! maxrandb May 2016 #3

Judge Sullivan is a Bill Clinton nominee to the bench. alp227 May 2016 #5

Nope. Appointed by Reagan, promoted by Poppy Bush. COLGATE4 May 2016 #47

Appointed by Reagan, then Poppy Bush, then Clinton. Ford_Prefect May 2016 #73

Reagan/Bush RW judge threatens Hillary in Crazy Larry Klayman suit. COLGATE4 May 2016 #7

Emmett G. Sullivan is a Bill Clinton nominee to the bench nt alp227 May 2016 #14

United States District Judge for the District of Columbia atreides1 May 2016 #24

No. elleng May 2016 #29

Can't you read what you post? Your link says exactly the same thing. COLGATE4 May 2016 #46

"On June 16, 1994, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Bill Clinton" arcane1 May 2016 #51

'On June 16, 1994, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Bill Clinton elleng May 2016 #55

Same Wikipedia entry COLGATE4 May 2016 #60

Doesnt matter, they will use ANY source to attack Hillary. Actor May 2016 #78

It is really getting tiresome. Some days I don't know whether I'm on COLGATE4 May 2016 #104

Both of you are correct. LiberalArkie May 2016 #69

Repeating it doesn't make it true. COLGATE4 May 2016 #48

Who was promoted twice by RW Presidents. COLGATE4 May 2016 #63

Well, twice by Republicans, and once by a triangulating "Centrist". bvar22 May 2016 #89

Why are you telling lies about the judge? Disagree with him if you want, but why lie? arcane1 May 2016 #15

They lie because it's all that they have. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #42

What lies am I telling about him. He is a Reagan appointee, promoted COLGATE4 May 2016 #44

"Appointed by Bill Clinton" you conveniently ignore. arcane1 May 2016 #49

Kind of like the current nominee for Scalia's seat, Dustlawyer May 2016 #57

No idea why Bill first appointed him. But he certainly comes with COLGATE4 May 2016 #62

Truth matters - I read the link, what struck me was that he was appointed by Bill Clinton on merbex May 2016 #59

Then look at your link again COLGATE4 May 2016 #61

Do you have a problem understanding how Federal Judges are appointed? merbex May 2016 #68

Which tells you something about his political leanings. COLGATE4 May 2016 #70

When poor people break the law they are predators who need punishment. Jemmons May 2016 #77

OMFG. "Justice is crying in her cell." COLGATE4 May 2016 #79

Being eloquent does not save you from being wrong. Jemmons May 2016 #106

Yeah, I'll get right on that. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #110

There is a prize to Starr that phrase into a short story. greiner3 May 2016 #111

Ouch. Just ouch. RiverNoord May 2016 #88

Everyone is correct LiberalArkie May 2016 #72

They hounded Bill Clinton over Whitewater for years WhiteTara May 2016 #9

Hills hid her Whitewater billing records for two years; lied to grand jury Divernan May 2016 #39

OMFG. Whitewater. Benghazi. Rose Law Firm. COLGATE4 May 2016 #52

It's what we trial lawyers call a pattern of behavior. Divernan May 2016 #65

Really? I don't think that's a pattern of behavior you'd COLGATE4 May 2016 #67

The scandals may have been imaginary elljay May 2016 #81

She's a peach isn't she? She is, without a doubt, one of the biggest control freaks in government merbex May 2016 #66

The records were exculpatory creeksneakers2 May 2016 #80

Miraculously found days after statute to sue HRC expired Divernan May 2016 #99

This is ridiculous. potone May 2016 #109

Some of Clinton's cronies were convicted in Whitewater. Akicita May 2016 #71

Mostly not cronies. creeksneakers2 May 2016 #82

The McDougals and Web Hubbel were definitely Clinton cronies. Akicita May 2016 #105

The developer got in trouble and went to jail. WhiteTara May 2016 #103

The judge may be a wing-nut, but he IS a federal judge Kelvin Mace May 2016 #18

I guess the important distinction is that you are not a federal judge. Bye now. nt thereismore May 2016 #43

U.S. District Court Judge does not work for tomm2thumbs May 2016 #6

Ask them how white water worked out for them leftofcool May 2016 #11

ask the current judge? tomm2thumbs May 2016 #12

Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow. frylock May 2016 #28

No, and no Federal judge ever let his political orientation COLGATE4 May 2016 #53

.... asuhornets May 2016 #8

judicial watch.............enough said! leftofcool May 2016 #10

Federal Judge.............enough said! frylock May 2016 #31

maybe she can ask for immunity in return for testifying tomm2thumbs May 2016 #13

Or move her fundraisers to the DC Circuit courthouse! Divernan May 2016 #102

Busted SusanLarson May 2016 #16

she seemed to indicate this in an ABC News story tomm2thumbs May 2016 #17

Where did you graduate Law School? COLGATE4 May 2016 #54

Hillary is immune from Section b. Akicita May 2016 #74

To evade public records disclosure? LOL! Prove it!!! Judicial watch and Klayman, nuff said. Laser102 May 2016 #19

Hence the inquiry, genius. nt thereismore May 2016 #40

Drip...Drip... SoapBox May 2016 #20

Yap...Yap... beastie boy May 2016 #41

Who the heck has ever said "She will never run"?! Old Crow May 2016 #87

Right wingers have been saying it years ago beastie boy May 2016 #90

Huh. You may be right. Old Crow May 2016 #91

her candidacy was a given to me too. She is just too ambitious to have passed it up, and she beastie boy May 2016 #92

Well, that's understandable. Old Crow May 2016 #93

"Accord is a lot more pleasant than discord." beastie boy May 2016 #94

Judicial Watch SusanLarson May 2016 #21

Or you beastie boy May 2016 #37

link to more info and the order magical thyme May 2016 #22

What's she going to do? Say yes? joshcryer May 2016 #23

'which are to be conducted over the next eight weeks' elleng May 2016 #25

my guess is... tomm2thumbs May 2016 #27

Could be, tomm, elleng May 2016 #33

That was the right wingers' hope, so they could damage the undamaged Bernie beastie boy May 2016 #45

cough gack sputter... frylock May 2016 #26

sounds familiar desmiller May 2016 #64

Piece. Of. Cake! fred v May 2016 #30

remember --------- this is not any part of the FBI investigation. grasswire May 2016 #32

"There have been at least three dozen civil lawsuits filed, including one by The Associated Press" Babel_17 May 2016 #35

Why delete any of the emails ? maindawg May 2016 #36

With such an authoritarian pronouncement I imagine you COLGATE4 May 2016 #56

A sworn deposition is just a signed piece of carefully legalistically crafted paper. Correct me if thereismore May 2016 #38

You're wrong. A sworn deposition is the transcribed record of one party's attorneys COLGATE4 May 2016 #58

Then they scramble and scour everything imaginable Gman May 2016 #50

Interesting precedent to set that a group other than Congress The Second Stone May 2016 #75

You are confusing two issues. BillZBubb May 2016 #95

I got that. If a FOIA plaintiff can question a cabinet secretary about The Second Stone May 2016 #96

Again you miss the point. They aren't going after top secret emails. BillZBubb May 2016 #97

No, I got that too. This opens up every department of the government where The Second Stone May 2016 #100

“Based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs. Clinton may be necessary,” seafan May 2016 #76

The operative word is "may." IOW, he kicked the decision-can down the road. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #83

And Trump may have to testify in the Trump University lawsuit left-of-center2012 May 2016 #85

Right now they're talking about a trial in the fall. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #86

So you're going with "our crook is better than your crook"? BillZBubb May 2016 #98

This is going to get REALLY Messy FreakinDJ May 2016 #101

It's only going to get "messy" maxrandb May 2016 #107

FUCK the Purity Testing FreakinDJ May 2016 #108

kick warrprayer May 2016 #112

Judicial Watch Progressive dog May 2016 #113