Latest Breaking News

thereismore

(13,326 posts)

40. Hence the inquiry, genius. nt

Reply to Laser102 (Reply #19)

Wed May 4, 2016, 05:05 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

114 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Judge: Clinton may be ordered to testify in records case [View all] alp227 May 2016 OP

Now folks, this is important. Delay is not an option. N/T Paper Roses May 2016 #1

what does tom delay have to do with this? niyad May 2016 #4

Wow. I think that actually caused me some brain damage. RiverNoord May 2016 #84

Ha ha...' niyad' made a funny laserhaas May 2016 #114

Not looking good for Her Majesty. BillZBubb May 2016 #2

Heard this one for years. beastie boy May 2016 #34

Judicial Watch----Yawn! maxrandb May 2016 #3

Judge Sullivan is a Bill Clinton nominee to the bench. alp227 May 2016 #5

Nope. Appointed by Reagan, promoted by Poppy Bush. COLGATE4 May 2016 #47

Appointed by Reagan, then Poppy Bush, then Clinton. Ford_Prefect May 2016 #73

Reagan/Bush RW judge threatens Hillary in Crazy Larry Klayman suit. COLGATE4 May 2016 #7

Emmett G. Sullivan is a Bill Clinton nominee to the bench nt alp227 May 2016 #14

United States District Judge for the District of Columbia atreides1 May 2016 #24

No. elleng May 2016 #29

Can't you read what you post? Your link says exactly the same thing. COLGATE4 May 2016 #46

"On June 16, 1994, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Bill Clinton" arcane1 May 2016 #51

'On June 16, 1994, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Bill Clinton elleng May 2016 #55

Same Wikipedia entry COLGATE4 May 2016 #60

Doesnt matter, they will use ANY source to attack Hillary. Actor May 2016 #78

It is really getting tiresome. Some days I don't know whether I'm on COLGATE4 May 2016 #104

Both of you are correct. LiberalArkie May 2016 #69

Repeating it doesn't make it true. COLGATE4 May 2016 #48

Who was promoted twice by RW Presidents. COLGATE4 May 2016 #63

Well, twice by Republicans, and once by a triangulating "Centrist". bvar22 May 2016 #89

Why are you telling lies about the judge? Disagree with him if you want, but why lie? arcane1 May 2016 #15

They lie because it's all that they have. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #42

What lies am I telling about him. He is a Reagan appointee, promoted COLGATE4 May 2016 #44

"Appointed by Bill Clinton" you conveniently ignore. arcane1 May 2016 #49

Kind of like the current nominee for Scalia's seat, Dustlawyer May 2016 #57

No idea why Bill first appointed him. But he certainly comes with COLGATE4 May 2016 #62

Truth matters - I read the link, what struck me was that he was appointed by Bill Clinton on merbex May 2016 #59

Then look at your link again COLGATE4 May 2016 #61

Do you have a problem understanding how Federal Judges are appointed? merbex May 2016 #68

Which tells you something about his political leanings. COLGATE4 May 2016 #70

When poor people break the law they are predators who need punishment. Jemmons May 2016 #77

OMFG. "Justice is crying in her cell." COLGATE4 May 2016 #79

Being eloquent does not save you from being wrong. Jemmons May 2016 #106

Yeah, I'll get right on that. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #110

There is a prize to Starr that phrase into a short story. greiner3 May 2016 #111

Ouch. Just ouch. RiverNoord May 2016 #88

Everyone is correct LiberalArkie May 2016 #72

They hounded Bill Clinton over Whitewater for years WhiteTara May 2016 #9

Hills hid her Whitewater billing records for two years; lied to grand jury Divernan May 2016 #39

OMFG. Whitewater. Benghazi. Rose Law Firm. COLGATE4 May 2016 #52

It's what we trial lawyers call a pattern of behavior. Divernan May 2016 #65

Really? I don't think that's a pattern of behavior you'd COLGATE4 May 2016 #67

The scandals may have been imaginary elljay May 2016 #81

She's a peach isn't she? She is, without a doubt, one of the biggest control freaks in government merbex May 2016 #66

The records were exculpatory creeksneakers2 May 2016 #80

Miraculously found days after statute to sue HRC expired Divernan May 2016 #99

This is ridiculous. potone May 2016 #109

Some of Clinton's cronies were convicted in Whitewater. Akicita May 2016 #71

Mostly not cronies. creeksneakers2 May 2016 #82

The McDougals and Web Hubbel were definitely Clinton cronies. Akicita May 2016 #105

The developer got in trouble and went to jail. WhiteTara May 2016 #103

The judge may be a wing-nut, but he IS a federal judge Kelvin Mace May 2016 #18

I guess the important distinction is that you are not a federal judge. Bye now. nt thereismore May 2016 #43

U.S. District Court Judge does not work for tomm2thumbs May 2016 #6

Ask them how white water worked out for them leftofcool May 2016 #11

ask the current judge? tomm2thumbs May 2016 #12

Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow. frylock May 2016 #28

No, and no Federal judge ever let his political orientation COLGATE4 May 2016 #53

.... asuhornets May 2016 #8

judicial watch.............enough said! leftofcool May 2016 #10

Federal Judge.............enough said! frylock May 2016 #31

maybe she can ask for immunity in return for testifying tomm2thumbs May 2016 #13

Or move her fundraisers to the DC Circuit courthouse! Divernan May 2016 #102

Busted SusanLarson May 2016 #16

she seemed to indicate this in an ABC News story tomm2thumbs May 2016 #17

Where did you graduate Law School? COLGATE4 May 2016 #54

Hillary is immune from Section b. Akicita May 2016 #74

To evade public records disclosure? LOL! Prove it!!! Judicial watch and Klayman, nuff said. Laser102 May 2016 #19

Hence the inquiry, genius. nt thereismore May 2016 #40

Drip...Drip... SoapBox May 2016 #20

Yap...Yap... beastie boy May 2016 #41

Who the heck has ever said "She will never run"?! Old Crow May 2016 #87

Right wingers have been saying it years ago beastie boy May 2016 #90

Huh. You may be right. Old Crow May 2016 #91

her candidacy was a given to me too. She is just too ambitious to have passed it up, and she beastie boy May 2016 #92

Well, that's understandable. Old Crow May 2016 #93

"Accord is a lot more pleasant than discord." beastie boy May 2016 #94

Judicial Watch SusanLarson May 2016 #21

Or you beastie boy May 2016 #37

link to more info and the order magical thyme May 2016 #22

What's she going to do? Say yes? joshcryer May 2016 #23

'which are to be conducted over the next eight weeks' elleng May 2016 #25

my guess is... tomm2thumbs May 2016 #27

Could be, tomm, elleng May 2016 #33

That was the right wingers' hope, so they could damage the undamaged Bernie beastie boy May 2016 #45

cough gack sputter... frylock May 2016 #26

sounds familiar desmiller May 2016 #64

Piece. Of. Cake! fred v May 2016 #30

remember --------- this is not any part of the FBI investigation. grasswire May 2016 #32

"There have been at least three dozen civil lawsuits filed, including one by The Associated Press" Babel_17 May 2016 #35

Why delete any of the emails ? maindawg May 2016 #36

With such an authoritarian pronouncement I imagine you COLGATE4 May 2016 #56

A sworn deposition is just a signed piece of carefully legalistically crafted paper. Correct me if thereismore May 2016 #38

You're wrong. A sworn deposition is the transcribed record of one party's attorneys COLGATE4 May 2016 #58

Then they scramble and scour everything imaginable Gman May 2016 #50

Interesting precedent to set that a group other than Congress The Second Stone May 2016 #75

You are confusing two issues. BillZBubb May 2016 #95

I got that. If a FOIA plaintiff can question a cabinet secretary about The Second Stone May 2016 #96

Again you miss the point. They aren't going after top secret emails. BillZBubb May 2016 #97

No, I got that too. This opens up every department of the government where The Second Stone May 2016 #100

“Based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs. Clinton may be necessary,” seafan May 2016 #76

The operative word is "may." IOW, he kicked the decision-can down the road. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #83

And Trump may have to testify in the Trump University lawsuit left-of-center2012 May 2016 #85

Right now they're talking about a trial in the fall. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #86

So you're going with "our crook is better than your crook"? BillZBubb May 2016 #98

This is going to get REALLY Messy FreakinDJ May 2016 #101

It's only going to get "messy" maxrandb May 2016 #107

FUCK the Purity Testing FreakinDJ May 2016 #108

kick warrprayer May 2016 #112

Judicial Watch Progressive dog May 2016 #113