Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US Judge: Clinton may be ordered to testify in records case [View all]tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)17. she seemed to indicate this in an ABC News story
"As much as Ive been investigated and all of that, you know, why would I - I dont even want - why would I ever want to do e-mail? Can you imagine?" she's seen on video captured at a fundraiser.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why are you telling lies about the judge? Disagree with him if you want, but why lie?
arcane1
May 2016
#15
Truth matters - I read the link, what struck me was that he was appointed by Bill Clinton on
merbex
May 2016
#59
She's a peach isn't she? She is, without a doubt, one of the biggest control freaks in government
merbex
May 2016
#66
I guess the important distinction is that you are not a federal judge. Bye now. nt
thereismore
May 2016
#43
To evade public records disclosure? LOL! Prove it!!! Judicial watch and Klayman, nuff said.
Laser102
May 2016
#19
her candidacy was a given to me too. She is just too ambitious to have passed it up, and she
beastie boy
May 2016
#92
That was the right wingers' hope, so they could damage the undamaged Bernie
beastie boy
May 2016
#45
"There have been at least three dozen civil lawsuits filed, including one by The Associated Press"
Babel_17
May 2016
#35
A sworn deposition is just a signed piece of carefully legalistically crafted paper. Correct me if
thereismore
May 2016
#38
You're wrong. A sworn deposition is the transcribed record of one party's attorneys
COLGATE4
May 2016
#58
I got that. If a FOIA plaintiff can question a cabinet secretary about
The Second Stone
May 2016
#96
No, I got that too. This opens up every department of the government where
The Second Stone
May 2016
#100