Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama: Clinton’s Email Server Did Not Jeopardize National Security [View all]tenderfoot
(8,601 posts)54. I often wonder what's to secure that people should be so concerned...
a crumbling infrastructure? no healthcare? Lead laden water? Contaminated meat? Underfunded schools?
I'm sure every rogue nation on Earth is itching at the bit to git us! Despite the cost to them of keeping up their conquest. Bugga bugga!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think you might be reaching just a bit there due to being biased towards Hillary.
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#4
It was purely based on the tone of your post but like I said if you are not biased
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#10
Nothing wrong with being a Bernie supporter, I think both Hillary and Bernie would be
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#58
I prefer to have the FBI and Justice Department come to that conclusion. Mr. Obama has a bias here.
roguevalley
Apr 2016
#45
No, I'm not refering to the investigation by the FBI and the DOJ. They will find whatever
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#57
Unspoken context: the felony statute Sec 793 doesn't require intent or actual jeopardy
leveymg
Apr 2016
#79
You're assuming quite a bit. Do you have any idea of what the FBI is really investigating?
George II
Apr 2016
#83
Well, you're the one who cited "felony statute Sec 793", so figured you knew.
George II
Apr 2016
#100
Obama characterized it as an "investigation" the other day. For many months, it has been referenced
leveymg
Apr 2016
#134
Mr. President Please Explain How Hillary Merits Your Comment As Being "Outstanding" As...
notadmblnd
Apr 2016
#2
Are you suggesting that news stories from outlets as Reuters should not be posted if you don't agree
still_one
Apr 2016
#11
However Obama said she was careless and didn't "Intentionally" put America in jeopardy
Autumn
Apr 2016
#7
And here I thought DU was a place to comment and discuss stories of political import.
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2016
#15
Because he isn't entitled to an opinion if it doesn't agree with some of the group-think here
still_one
Apr 2016
#18
Actually do you have anything to support your implication of a criminal investigstion?
Cary
Apr 2016
#46
Absolutely none of that supports your claim that she, personally, is under investigation
Cary
Apr 2016
#130
The investigation is into whether a crime has even been committed, and if so, by whom.
beastie boy
Apr 2016
#87
Where in the article you referenced does it say that her email server didn't jeopardize security?
revbones
Apr 2016
#27
Thanks for replying so nicely. Really shows the positivity of the Hillary followers.
revbones
Apr 2016
#72
The President is correct again. He knows it's just about politics. I don't care about emails.
Trust Buster
Apr 2016
#29
It is a problem with them also. It suggests a very sloppy attitude toward email security in
RiverNoord
Apr 2016
#129
This is somebody who has served his country for decades in the military, and
Schema Thing
Apr 2016
#33
What else would we expect from the man that backs DWS in her Congressional race?
jalan48
Apr 2016
#38
Actually, it did. But not in the way the right wingers and Sandernistas will have you believe.
beastie boy
Apr 2016
#73