Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LAS14

(13,792 posts)
Fri Sep 15, 2017, 11:04 AM Sep 2017

Some feminist lawyers side with Trump and DeVos. [View all]

Last edited Mon Sep 18, 2017, 08:56 AM - Edit history (2)

Looks like I'm in good company. I tried to get a conversation started on this a few days ago (see first link). Now I see that great minds run.... See Globe article in second link.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029586036

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/09/14/surprisingly-some-feminist-lawyers-side-with-trump-and-devos-campus-assault-policy/ArigBzO86tERWpDW17DbTI/story.html?s_campaign=8315

What do the rest of you think?

I hear that the Globe is asking for payment. I'm allowed two paragraphs, right?

When Education Secretary Betsy DeVos last week announced plans to revise the nation’s guidelines on campus sexual assault, the predictable din of outrage drowned out the applause from some unlikely corners of college campuses: Many liberals actually approve.

Groups of Harvard Law scholars, feminist lawyers, and other university professors had long argued that the Obama-era policy for policing student sexual charges was unfair, creating a Kafkaesque system that presumed guilt rather than innocence. Now, those academics find themselves atypically aligned with the Trump administration on an issue as contentious as sexual violence.

...
Covering faculty and students, the new [Obama] guidelines demanded that schools address every accusation and adopt a weaker standard of evidence than some had already been using. Rather than proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt, as in a criminal trial, or offering “clear and convincing evidence” that an offense was committed, it called for claims to be adjudicated based on a “preponderance of evidence” — to determine whether guilt was “more likely than not.”


The Globe article declares that this made the bar lower than for any other campus infraction.

....

When DeVos raised such issues last week, legions of feminists, distrustful of a president who had bragged about his sexual conquests, bristled at the sound of it. But critics in academia and law had been voicing those same complaints for years. In 2014, 28 Harvard Law professors published an open letter in The Boston Globe criticizing Harvard’s then-new policy as “overwhelmingly stacked against the accused.”


As I understand it, the DeVos policy simply rescinds the Obama-era policy.


27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can't read it because it is behind a paywall. nt DURHAM D Sep 2017 #1
I think I'm allowed to quote 2 paras, right? LAS14 Sep 2017 #4
Interesting read cyclonefence Sep 2017 #2
she could be mistaken dsc Sep 2017 #3
Yes, but cyclonefence Sep 2017 #6
Could you explain more fully? LAS14 Sep 2017 #5
I am not equating women with children cyclonefence Sep 2017 #7
OK, then let's work really hard to insure that victim's accusations... LAS14 Sep 2017 #9
I understand what you're saying cyclonefence Sep 2017 #10
This kind of reasoning would make me crazy if I were... LAS14 Sep 2017 #8
That line of reasoning makes you crazy? Why? kcr Sep 2017 #14
It would make me crazy to think that in the case of rape... LAS14 Sep 2017 #19
You're confusing me with someone else. I didn't say anything about "no bono", whatever that means. kcr Sep 2017 #23
Cyclone fence used the phrase cui bono... who benefits, and... LAS14 Sep 2017 #24
Bumping after an unwanted hiatus. nt LAS14 Sep 2017 #11
I am not boasting about getting out of jury duty, understand that from the get go.... usedtobedemgurl Sep 2017 #12
I don't disagree that their is a history... LAS14 Sep 2017 #16
No one is saying we should put rapists in jail without a trial.... usedtobedemgurl Sep 2017 #22
I hold an opinion less popular than Title IX advocates OR Betsy Devoss Nevernose Sep 2017 #13
Thanks for articulating another angle that... LAS14 Sep 2017 #15
I can't read the article so I don't know what their criteria is for calling these lawyers feminist kcr Sep 2017 #17
I added 2 more paras and a comment of my own. nt LAS14 Sep 2017 #20
Four paragraphs. nt tblue37 Sep 2017 #18
Thanks. I added 2 more paras and a comment of my own. nt LAS14 Sep 2017 #21
Not all about legal zipplewrath Sep 2017 #25
Thanks. Thoughtful and intelligent. nt LAS14 Sep 2017 #27
This is very empowering to this feminist get the red out Sep 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some feminist lawyers sid...