Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is no legal group challenging this voter registration info request for its "chilling effect" on [View all]Gothmog
(145,321 posts)20. Lawsuit Slams Election Commissions Request: Without Precedent And Crazy
The first lawsuit http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/lawsuit-slams-election-integrity-commission
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), a privacy advocacy group, filed suit on Monday against President Donald Trumps bogus election integrity commission over its request to all 50 states for sensitive voter information.
[T]he Commission had already committed two egregious security blunders, EPIC said in a statement on its website. (1) directing state election officials to send voter records to an unsecure web site and (2) proposing to publish partial SSNs that would enable identity theft and financial fraud.
In its suit requesting a temporary injunction against the commissions data collection activities, filed in the D.C. District Court, the group called the request for partial Social Security numbers both without precedent and crazy.
It also accused the commission of violating the E-Government Act of 2002, which requires a privacy impact assessment be completed and made available to the public before the collection of personal information by the federal government using information technology. No assessment was conducted before requesting voter data, the suit alleges.
The commissions broad request for data combined with the lack of any privacy assessment could cause irreparable harm to EPICs members, the suit alleged.....
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly gave the defendants until 4:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday to respond to the suit.
[T]he Commission had already committed two egregious security blunders, EPIC said in a statement on its website. (1) directing state election officials to send voter records to an unsecure web site and (2) proposing to publish partial SSNs that would enable identity theft and financial fraud.
In its suit requesting a temporary injunction against the commissions data collection activities, filed in the D.C. District Court, the group called the request for partial Social Security numbers both without precedent and crazy.
It also accused the commission of violating the E-Government Act of 2002, which requires a privacy impact assessment be completed and made available to the public before the collection of personal information by the federal government using information technology. No assessment was conducted before requesting voter data, the suit alleges.
The commissions broad request for data combined with the lack of any privacy assessment could cause irreparable harm to EPICs members, the suit alleged.....
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly gave the defendants until 4:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday to respond to the suit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is no legal group challenging this voter registration info request for its "chilling effect" on [View all]
nikibatts
Jul 2017
OP
The point is THE REQUEST ITSSELF! No data has to be turned over at all for it to suppress the vote.
nikibatts
Jul 2017
#10
The problem is that you need a justiciable controversy - a plaintiff
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2017
#14
What if i say that I am "afraid" right now to register because I might lose my job if I register?
nikibatts
Jul 2017
#26
It's not illegal to be registered in more than one state as long as
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2017
#19
Kobach used Interstate Crosscheck in several states to go after similar sounding AA...
brush
Jul 2017
#28
Great! I'm glad somebody found a basis for requesting an injunction.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2017
#21