Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
36. Well, let's assume I wrote you one of those love letters, using DUMail.
Thu Jul 5, 2012, 10:51 AM
Jul 2012

And then, later, I fell out of love with you and started consorting with another DU member and treating you poorly and saying dreadful things about you as a person. Wouldn't you perhaps be motivated to wave those love letters like a bloody shirt, as proof of a previous opinion and evidence of an agenda?

I take your point; I realize that most people don't like having their quieter conversations thrust into the public square, but I do think that the publication of an off-forum/off-group (but not off-board) conversation that doesn't match what people are saying publicly is instructive, particularly when trying to determine the veracity of an individual.

Example--a person declares, on this board, that they never would say "X" about so-and-so. Someone else provides a screenshot showing that the person did indeed say "X" and in a very nasty way as well.

It all goes to veracity and honesty and things of that nature. I think it should be used sparingly, but people who say one thing in public and another in private should probably recalibrate their integrity meters.

Have no illusions, nothing is "priivate" on the internet. bemildred Jul 2012 #1
i have no illusions either. nothing is private. but, that is not my question. i am asking seabeyond Jul 2012 #3
I think it should be within the rules, but one should keep in mind they may end up looking like... Ian David Jul 2012 #2
again, valid points. and i get that. that is not what my OP is about. i get that seabeyond Jul 2012 #7
It depends what the PMs are about. Ian David Jul 2012 #13
ya. that would make a little difference. but, not really, lol. i wouldnt. if i felt the seabeyond Jul 2012 #15
posting peoples pms for all to read? napkinz Jul 2012 #4
and talk about napkins?.... rollin eyes. nt seabeyond Jul 2012 #9
They aren't PMs--they are DUMail. MADem Jul 2012 #5
Uh, I think naps was being sarcastic DiverDave Jul 2012 #14
that's why I added the WINK napkinz Jul 2012 #16
On DU2, they were called PMs -- P as in Private. M as in Mail. MADem Jul 2012 #27
I think it is more polite to ask permission before disclosing private correspondence malthaussen Jul 2012 #25
there you go. it is not about anything being nefarious, or obnoxious to be hidden. nt seabeyond Jul 2012 #32
Well, let's assume I wrote you one of those love letters, using DUMail. MADem Jul 2012 #36
I have no problem with it JustAnotherGen Jul 2012 #6
i have a very tough time wrapping my mind around that. so funny. nt seabeyond Jul 2012 #12
Given that the purpose of pm is to be private, malthaussen Jul 2012 #8
Very bad idea in my view. seabeyond Jul 2012 #11
I think it's a horrible idea... TreasonousBastard Jul 2012 #10
Commen sense solution demwing Jul 2012 #17
i get this. but, that is not what my pm is about. it is about how we personally feel about pms seabeyond Jul 2012 #18
What if a DU is encouraging another DUer to behave badly towards a third? MADem Jul 2012 #40
If you send a snail mail letter to someone, that person has always had the right snot Jul 2012 #19
i would no more share private writings to me thru snail mail than i would read private mail seabeyond Jul 2012 #21
I don't see a problem, unless there was a previous agreement to keep it confidential muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #20
DU3 does not have PM's Ohio Joe Jul 2012 #22
one on one conversation, to me, is the promise that i was raised with. it is what i was taught seabeyond Jul 2012 #24
You should not make such assumptions Ohio Joe Jul 2012 #31
it doesnt matter to me joe. it is who i am. it works for me. it is the way i was raised. seabeyond Jul 2012 #33
Just because it's not against the rules doesn't make it a good thing The empressof all Jul 2012 #23
it really does not effect me at all. seabeyond Jul 2012 #30
I'd never do it. Iggo Jul 2012 #26
even that. all the taunting in the world, i still will not do it seabeyond Jul 2012 #35
It's called a "private message" for a reason. I'm going with common sense here..n/t monmouth Jul 2012 #28
It's not, though. The name was changed. MADem Jul 2012 #44
Ahh, thanks, did not know that. I rarely PM people so thanks for the info..n/t monmouth Jul 2012 #49
DU3 is all about transparency. Admins designed it that way. Lars39 Jul 2012 #29
again, i am talking about personal choices we make. not about the administration or transparency. nt seabeyond Jul 2012 #37
And again, doesn't matter. Lars39 Jul 2012 #41
email would be no more protected. not about allowing, it is about if you personally do not have seabeyond Jul 2012 #45
Except for the magic that is the self delete feature when used along with the host forum Bluenorthwest Jul 2012 #47
It's interesting how questions of ethics often seem to degenerate into questions of law. malthaussen Jul 2012 #34
questions of ethics often seem to degenerate into questions of law. seabeyond Jul 2012 #38
I think it's more complicated than a yes or no vote. jorno67 Jul 2012 #39
i thought about that and decided i wanted it no more complicated than a yes or no seabeyond Jul 2012 #43
Fair enough... jorno67 Jul 2012 #46
sigh.... seabeyond Jul 2012 #48
No problem with it at all. polly7 Jul 2012 #42
I'm going to lock this. HappyMe Jul 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»i am curious what a large...»Reply #36