Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 01:32 PM Dec 2016

Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters [View all]

Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didn’t Prosecute Banksters

David Dayen
September 15 2016, 12:00 a.m.


LIKE A LOT OF other Americans, Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to know why the Department of Justice hasn’t criminally prosecuted any of the major players responsible for the 2008 financial crisis.

On Thursday, Warren released two highly provocative letters demanding some explanations. One is to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, requesting a review of how federal law enforcement managed to whiff on all 11 substantive criminal referrals submitted by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a panel set up to examine the causes of the 2008 meltdown.

The other is to FBI Director James Comey, asking him to release all FBI investigations and deliberations related to those referrals. The FBI typically doesn’t release investigative details about cases that the DOJ chooses not to pursue, but Warren pointed out that in releasing information about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server in July, Comey had pretty much shattered that precedent and set a new one.

“You explained these actions by noting your view that ‘the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest,’” Warren wrote to Comey. “If Secretary Clinton’s email server was of sufficient ‘interest’ to establish a new FBI standard of transparency, then surely the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the 2008 financial crisis should be subject to the same level of transparency.”.

~Snip~

And the FCIC named names, specifying nine top-level executives who should be investigated on criminal charges: CEO Daniel Mudd and CFO Stephen Swad of Fannie Mae; CEO Martin Sullivan and CFO Stephen Bensinger of AIG; CEO Stan O’Neal and CFO Jeffrey Edwards of Merrill Lynch; and CEO Chuck Prince, CFO Gary Crittenden, and Board Chairman Robert Rubin of Citigroup...

Read more:
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/15/elizabeth-warren-asks-newly-chatty-fbi-director-to-explain-why-doj-didnt-prosecute-banksters/
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
YES! skylucy Dec 2016 #1
Exactly my reaction, too. Go Senator Warren! More, please. JudyM Dec 2016 #4
they didn't care then, and after this election, they even care less. still_one Dec 2016 #2
At least we have someone like Warren trying to get justice. Eventually the voters think Dec 2016 #3
I agree with your point regarding Warren fighting for us, but I really have my doubts if the voters still_one Dec 2016 #5
I'm with you on this Plucketeer Dec 2016 #13
Warren would do a great service to the country in highlighting this "injustice" that many in ...... dmosh42 Dec 2016 #6
I hope she runs in 2020 and if Hillary scared the Republicans imagine what cstanleytech Dec 2016 #7
I hoped she ran in 2016... n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #9
She had already declared she wasnt and if she had suddenly changed her mind cstanleytech Dec 2016 #19
He doesn't make that decision. Eric Holder did and Holder gave testimony as to why... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #8
Then Holder left office to go back to the same law firm he was before while they defend these banks think Dec 2016 #12
I Don't Blame Obama And Holder For Not Prosecuting Banks OldYallow Dec 2016 #30
Yes! We are at war, afterall. C Moon Dec 2016 #10
Maybe Warren should ask Eric Holder, he was the one in charge of the DOJ Lurks Often Dec 2016 #11
Someone asked Holder, his response... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #15
IMO, maybe Senator Warren should ask that question gladium et scutum Dec 2016 #18
Yep. SomeGuyInEagan Dec 2016 #24
Our first woman President. zentrum Dec 2016 #14
Kick'em in the balls Senator Warren....Hard! Stellar Dec 2016 #16
The answer is that these banks own too many (almost all) of our politicians! Dustlawyer Dec 2016 #17
kickarooni!. . . . . . n/t annabanana Dec 2016 #20
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Dec 2016 #21
K & R Scurrilous Dec 2016 #22
Expect action on this Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2016 #23
I suspect all she will hear as a way of a reply is the sound of crickets as Comey cstanleytech Dec 2016 #25
Jimmy "the Flake" Comey needs to answer. He was all too eager oasis Dec 2016 #26
God bless her! harun Dec 2016 #27
IMO, she should not have mentioned the clinton emails, it takes away from the letters power. frankieallen Dec 2016 #28
No it does not. Actually makes the point perfectly. Justice Dec 2016 #29
+1, It's to shine a big light on their hypocrisy, change the status quo. harun Dec 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren Asks New...