Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters [View all]
Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters
David Dayen
September 15 2016, 12:00 a.m.
LIKE A LOT OF other Americans, Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to know why the Department of Justice hasnt criminally prosecuted any of the major players responsible for the 2008 financial crisis.
On Thursday, Warren released two highly provocative letters demanding some explanations. One is to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, requesting a review of how federal law enforcement managed to whiff on all 11 substantive criminal referrals submitted by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a panel set up to examine the causes of the 2008 meltdown.
The other is to FBI Director James Comey, asking him to release all FBI investigations and deliberations related to those referrals. The FBI typically doesnt release investigative details about cases that the DOJ chooses not to pursue, but Warren pointed out that in releasing information about presidential candidate Hillary Clintons use of a private email server in July, Comey had pretty much shattered that precedent and set a new one.
You explained these actions by noting your view that the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest, Warren wrote to Comey. If Secretary Clintons email server was of sufficient interest to establish a new FBI standard of transparency, then surely the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the 2008 financial crisis should be subject to the same level of transparency..
~Snip~
And the FCIC named names, specifying nine top-level executives who should be investigated on criminal charges: CEO Daniel Mudd and CFO Stephen Swad of Fannie Mae; CEO Martin Sullivan and CFO Stephen Bensinger of AIG; CEO Stan ONeal and CFO Jeffrey Edwards of Merrill Lynch; and CEO Chuck Prince, CFO Gary Crittenden, and Board Chairman Robert Rubin of Citigroup...
Read more:
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/15/elizabeth-warren-asks-newly-chatty-fbi-director-to-explain-why-doj-didnt-prosecute-banksters/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
31 replies, 9237 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (122)
ReplyReply to this post
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters [View all]
think
Dec 2016
OP
I agree with your point regarding Warren fighting for us, but I really have my doubts if the voters
still_one
Dec 2016
#5
Warren would do a great service to the country in highlighting this "injustice" that many in ......
dmosh42
Dec 2016
#6
She had already declared she wasnt and if she had suddenly changed her mind
cstanleytech
Dec 2016
#19
He doesn't make that decision. Eric Holder did and Holder gave testimony as to why...
PoliticAverse
Dec 2016
#8
Then Holder left office to go back to the same law firm he was before while they defend these banks
think
Dec 2016
#12
The answer is that these banks own too many (almost all) of our politicians!
Dustlawyer
Dec 2016
#17
I suspect all she will hear as a way of a reply is the sound of crickets as Comey
cstanleytech
Dec 2016
#25
IMO, she should not have mentioned the clinton emails, it takes away from the letters power.
frankieallen
Dec 2016
#28