Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:52 AM Jun 2012

Introduction to Porn Part 10: The Rutting Dogs of Capitalism [View all]

http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/2012/02/12/introduction-to-porn-part-10-the-rutting-dogs-of-capitalism/

The title of this post at The Activists, “Pornography Is One of the Most Powerful Weapons in the Hands of the State and the Ruling Elites,” though it is a little reminiscent of a Rolcats caption, held enough promise that I decided to read it. Read the post if you must (especially if you are a dude who fancies himself a political radical but can’t be convinced by women that you should eschew porn because it’s one of the chief obstacles to the ending of women’s oppression), but it’s really not much other than a fairly ridiculous “what about the men” argument against porn use in which men are urged to give up pornography because it is a tool designed to control men. Reading that post shortly after this one from Valerie M at We Won’t Submit reinforced something I confront quite often: surely, the post was written by a man, and the responses I’ve seen to it thus far indicate that, while denigrating or ignoring decades of toil by anti-porn feminists, everyone is going to fall all over themselves for a chance to fellate any dude who makes an anti-porn argument, no matter how incapable he might be of identifying the real (or at least most harmed) victims of the pornography industry.

Well, everyone is going to have to fellate me instead, because I have a better understanding of the relationship between pornography and capitalism than The Activists do, and because I can express that understanding without resorting to jargon-laden, propagandistic language that would make even Komsomol alumni scoff at its lack of style and subtlety.

The problem with most radical anti-capitalist literature aimed at mass audiences is the inherent assumption that the reader is too dumb to understand the complexities of political and economic power. This leads propagandists to make reference to “capitalists,” “capital,” or “capitalism” as if referring to an individual or an entity made up of a small number of people who coordinate and direct the workings of vast social, political, and economic systems. There is a reason that Marxist/communist/anti-capitalist propaganda has essentially failed as a lasting means to directing the consciousness of large numbers of people: its simplistic formulas are easily undermined by complicated realities, and by the fragmented nature of capitalism as a world system lacking in a single identifiable center of power. When “the masses” try to understand the impact capitalism has on their lives, unless they’re anti-semitic fruitcakes who adore Alex Jones and believe the world is run by shape-shifting lizard descendants of the Knights Templar who present as Jewish bankers, they don’t envision their bosses sitting in a room with the CEOs of Anheuser-Busch and Countrywide hatching a plot to keep them in servitude.

Which is why telling men that “the ruling elite” and “the state” sap their vitality and “milk” them of their “essence” via the “pornographic machine” is unlikely to convince them to stop using porn. I know most men don’t need any convincing that they ought to conceive of jizz as their essence and the supreme indicator of their vitality, but the idea that “the state” seeks to enslave the male population by encouraging them to expend all of their semen is a bit much. Even with a firm grip on the interlocking relationship between capital and governance, no one is likely to believe that a cabal of employers and government officials sit around rubbing their hands together in maniacal glee at the genius of their evil plot to addict the populace to wanking to gang bangs. And everyone knows that most people will write off the entirety of a system of ideas once they detect deception or a perceived logical flaw in a facet of that system of ideas that requires that they do anything other than what they want to do at a given moment. Self-justification is the most formidable foe any activist movement faces.

~ snip ~

---------------------------------------------------------------

Since everyone else seems to be doing a porn thread, I figured I would join the bunch by drawing attention to a RadFem site which gives some excellent arguments about the damage that porn does.
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So let me get this right; lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #1
How much of her blog have you read? FrodosPet Jun 2012 #2
+1. nt seabeyond Jun 2012 #4
Just this post. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #5
It is very representative. FrodosPet Jun 2012 #6
I've noticed all the arguments on the damage of porn are entirely 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #3
How about this relationship? Confusious Jun 2012 #7
There was a thread on that 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #10
Wasn't my thread, Confusious Jun 2012 #11
Porn Part 8: Rights vs. Privileges FrodosPet Jun 2012 #13
"men do not have a right to use pornography" 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #14
And your article here is about 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #15
I may be wrong, I don't want to speak for her FrodosPet Jun 2012 #19
If so she makes little indication 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #20
It's really not any different than saying 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #21
Allowing porn does not make a country good or bad regarding its treatment of women. Confusious Jun 2012 #22
^THIS^ nt hifiguy Jun 2012 #8
Uses buzzwords Confusious Jun 2012 #9
this baloney needs a lot of mustard lol nt msongs Jun 2012 #12
you say you are drawing attention to a "rad fem" site but you're linking to a right-wing site HiPointDem Jun 2012 #16
Are we looking at the same site? FrodosPet Jun 2012 #18
i couldn't read past this: HiPointDem Jun 2012 #23
I found it! I finally found concrete evidence that porn causes harm 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #17
Here's a gem from another essay on that site: cemaphonic Jun 2012 #24
Wouldn't that make any job slavery? 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Introduction to Porn Part...