Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Last edited Wed Dec 7, 2016, 02:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Are the executives taking big cuts in their absurd compensation packages "so that we can continue to be competitive"?
Why aren't shareholders filling executive positions with somebody who will do the job for a fraction of what these guys pay themselves? Business schools in India and elsewhere turn out lots of MBAs and I'd bet some would do the job just fine for relative peanuts. If "competition" is good then shouldn't white collar have to compete in the global marketplace just like blue collar?
If "competition" is destroying so many people's livelihoods then maybe competition isn't such a good thing after all.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read