Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WikiLeaks is a disgusting, bigoted right-wing organization that no progressive can justify backing [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)106. You are probably too young to have read all about it
Last edited Sun Aug 28, 2016, 01:00 PM - Edit history (1)
but the statements were all made public a number of years ago.
It is an undisputed fact that both women initiated their contact with Assange, that they aggressively pursued him until they got him into their beds. Yes, in both cases, it was the women's bed they had invited Assange to share with them, in order to have sex.
The only dispute that ensued, days after the incidents, and only after both women learned that Assange had had sex with the both of them, was over the question how they could be sure that they weren't infected with AIDS.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WikiLeaks is a disgusting, bigoted right-wing organization that no progressive can justify backing [View all]
ButterflyBlood
Aug 2016
OP
Yes! It needs doing but wikileaks seems to not be vetting what they put out. nt
Mojorabbit
Aug 2016
#81
How is outing gays and lesbians in a hostile country amd doxxing rape victims whistleblowing?
ButterflyBlood
Aug 2016
#19
You clearly haven't read the OP because you haven't responded to its points. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2016
#20
... and no SSNs were reveled, they didn't defend Lessdogs attacker, they've doxxed tRump?
uponit7771
Aug 2016
#43
Yes. As a woman, when I refer to a man, it must be because a certain part of my
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#66
Yes. It does. If your primary language does not have an equivalent to "Ms.," I can
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#86
Scott Ritter has four separate incidents/convictions, and is an admitted sex offender.
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#94
So? What I find revealing about you, reorg, is that if any poster on DU cares to look at the
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#99
You believe identifying thousands of rape victims and outing gay men is whistleblowing...?
LanternWaste
Aug 2016
#117
Go ahead, get it off your chest, call me a ni**er. I suspect you'll feel much better.
MadDAsHell
Aug 2016
#118
They didn't actively interfere in elections then. Read the OP to see what else changed. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2016
#21
I never backed Wikileaks. Ever. Some of us on DU weren't fooled from the start.
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#30
I'm proud to say that I called Assange a traitorous, lying, little shit from day one.
FLPanhandle
Aug 2016
#25
He'll be in our favor again once he starts attacking repukes. Until then F Wikileaks.
ileus
Aug 2016
#29
Funny how some DUers pick and choose which rape/assault/sexual harassment accusations matter...
MadDAsHell
Aug 2016
#32
Assange admitted to the acts. His defense against extradition was that the acts were not crimes. Nt
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#54
Right--like Assange hadn't been involved before that. Come on.....some of actually
msanthrope
Aug 2016
#61
Outing gays and violating the privacy of rape victims are not "leaks of government wrongdoing"
ButterflyBlood
Aug 2016
#110
"Outing gays and violating the privacy of rape victims are not "leaks of government wrongdoing""
MadDAsHell
Aug 2016
#113
Yes. Fearing government will discover what is in a leaked government report. Ahem!
Festivito
Aug 2016
#108