Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reorg

(3,317 posts)
106. You are probably too young to have read all about it
Sat Aug 27, 2016, 09:53 PM
Aug 2016

Last edited Sun Aug 28, 2016, 01:00 PM - Edit history (1)

but the statements were all made public a number of years ago.

It is an undisputed fact that both women initiated their contact with Assange, that they aggressively pursued him until they got him into their beds. Yes, in both cases, it was the women's bed they had invited Assange to share with them, in order to have sex.

The only dispute that ensued, days after the incidents, and only after both women learned that Assange had had sex with the both of them, was over the question how they could be sure that they weren't infected with AIDS.

K&R KMOD Aug 2016 #1
^^THIS^^ stopbush Aug 2016 #2
Assange should be buried under the jail mwrguy Aug 2016 #3
Just anything to get noticed, he needs to take care of his business. Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #4
He's an egomaniacal revenge driven PoS. UtahLib Aug 2016 #5
Completely agree. Never have liked or trusted Assange. mountain grammy Aug 2016 #6
He seemed like an egotistical asshole from the beginning ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #7
I once thought he was sort of OK. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #9
Yeah but is the US government any more trustworthy? davidn3600 Aug 2016 #8
Oh, you're right. SusanCalvin Aug 2016 #10
Julian is an anti-Semite awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #12
Sorry, but that is bogus false equivalency. Tortmaster Aug 2016 #16
Welcome to DU. Post more. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #26
Welcome to DU, and I mean that sincerely. Hope to see you around. Hekate Aug 2016 #36
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2016 #42
Thank you treestar Aug 2016 #48
Welcome to DU !!! reACTIONary Aug 2016 #67
Welcome great re-tort. Historic NY Aug 2016 #69
Solution: a wikileaks competitor/alternative ecodeathmarch Aug 2016 #18
Already done. Cryptome is the real deal...always has been. msanthrope Aug 2016 #28
the alternatives are either obscure or fakes reorg Aug 2016 #73
Ya, whistleblower portals live under heavy abuse but ecodeathmarch Aug 2016 #107
Yes! It needs doing but wikileaks seems to not be vetting what they put out. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2016 #81
fuckin wow... so the US gov outs gay folk in SA?!?! uponit7771 Aug 2016 #41
No...Assange does. nt MADem Aug 2016 #62
It's not a binary choice. Bradical79 Aug 2016 #50
sure, when we have a dem admin stupidicus Aug 2016 #72
Is it possible to somehow support wikileaks Volaris Aug 2016 #74
Wow, times have changed on DU. MadDAsHell Aug 2016 #11
Yup. They have indeed. The space under the bus gets bigger and bigger. PoutrageFatigue Aug 2016 #13
Thieves. Tortmaster Aug 2016 #17
How is outing gays and lesbians in a hostile country amd doxxing rape victims whistleblowing? ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #19
You clearly haven't read the OP because you haven't responded to its points. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #20
Kindly explain how outing gays is whistleblowing? nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #24
nobody 'outed gays' reorg Aug 2016 #40
... and no SSNs were reveled, they didn't defend Lessdogs attacker, they've doxxed tRump? uponit7771 Aug 2016 #43
Many on this board learned a mighty lesson thanks to Scott Ritter. msanthrope Aug 2016 #57
Sure, Assange is CIA, got it. reorg Aug 2016 #58
Well...as Stephen Colbert mused when he interviewed Assange, who else would msanthrope Aug 2016 #60
do you have a crush on Stephen Colbert? reorg Aug 2016 #65
Yes. As a woman, when I refer to a man, it must be because a certain part of my msanthrope Aug 2016 #66
do only females 'have a crush'? reorg Aug 2016 #70
My username indicates my gender. Your defense of Assange is revealing. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #76
It does? reorg Aug 2016 #79
Yes. It does. If your primary language does not have an equivalent to "Ms.," I can msanthrope Aug 2016 #86
I don't think so, actually reorg Aug 2016 #93
Scott Ritter has four separate incidents/convictions, and is an admitted sex offender. msanthrope Aug 2016 #94
So? reorg Aug 2016 #98
So? What I find revealing about you, reorg, is that if any poster on DU cares to look at the msanthrope Aug 2016 #99
Not sure what you found was revealing reorg Aug 2016 #103
You're so much better than me dlwickham Aug 2016 #78
I was tempted. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #80
I guess that would have been against the rules reorg Aug 2016 #85
You're simply assuming every person deserves that description treestar Aug 2016 #49
You believe identifying thousands of rape victims and outing gay men is whistleblowing...? LanternWaste Aug 2016 #117
Go ahead, get it off your chest, call me a ni**er. I suspect you'll feel much better. MadDAsHell Aug 2016 #118
Funny, they were backed when Bush was President. former9thward Aug 2016 #14
They started doxxing persecuted minorities in despotic countries? sweetloukillbot Aug 2016 #15
They didn't actively interfere in elections then. Read the OP to see what else changed. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #21
I never backed Wikileaks. Ever. Some of us on DU weren't fooled from the start. msanthrope Aug 2016 #30
I'm going with this Hekate Aug 2016 #35
I always found it suspect. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2016 #56
This! ^^^^^ ColesCountyDem Aug 2016 #68
<---- same Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #75
+ infinity Quayblue Aug 2016 #112
Broke clock uponit7771 Aug 2016 #44
Also, how were we to know it was a front for Russian hackers & trolls? Rex Aug 2016 #63
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2016 #109
What did they release then? treestar Aug 2016 #52
These were all celebrated and praised here. former9thward Aug 2016 #111
so more or less treestar Aug 2016 #114
I'm giving this another kick.. mountain grammy Aug 2016 #22
K&R smirkymonkey Aug 2016 #23
I'm proud to say that I called Assange a traitorous, lying, little shit from day one. FLPanhandle Aug 2016 #25
K&R mcar Aug 2016 #27
He'll be in our favor again once he starts attacking repukes. Until then F Wikileaks. ileus Aug 2016 #29
No......he's never been in my favor, and that rapist never will be. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #31
Funny how some DUers pick and choose which rape/assault/sexual harassment accusations matter... MadDAsHell Aug 2016 #32
What rape accusations are you referring to? Nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #55
Careful.... You are on the verge of sounding hypocritical... davidn3600 Aug 2016 #34
Assange admitted to the acts. His defense against extradition was that the acts were not crimes. Nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #54
False reorg Aug 2016 #84
Yes....and here are the transcripts where he did so. msanthrope Aug 2016 #88
Thank you very much, I already read these transcripts, years ago. reorg Aug 2016 #95
The rape case has not run out. Nor, have the other charges, necessarily. msanthrope Aug 2016 #97
Wrong reorg Aug 2016 #100
Oh yeah she probably enjoyed it ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #105
You are probably too young to have read all about it reorg Aug 2016 #106
What makes you think he ever will? ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #37
He won't attack Repubs treestar Aug 2016 #51
Thank you Jim Dandy Aug 2016 #33
Liberals loved them and Conservatives hated them when Bush was President. dilby Aug 2016 #38
Broke clock uponit7771 Aug 2016 #45
K&R lupinella Aug 2016 #39
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2016 #46
Did they expose anything that happened treestar Aug 2016 #47
Assange started WikiLeaks in 2006 davidn3600 Aug 2016 #53
Right--like Assange hadn't been involved before that. Come on.....some of actually msanthrope Aug 2016 #61
They did, but they used to be credible. Oneironaut Aug 2016 #83
Would it matter? MadDAsHell Aug 2016 #101
Of course! Elmergantry Aug 2016 #102
Outing gays and violating the privacy of rape victims are not "leaks of government wrongdoing" ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #110
"Outing gays and violating the privacy of rape victims are not "leaks of government wrongdoing"" MadDAsHell Aug 2016 #113
I would hope nobody likes those leaks treestar Aug 2016 #116
It's not automatically evidence of "wrongdoing" treestar Aug 2016 #115
a good summary of all those talking points reorg Aug 2016 #59
Yes. Fearing government will discover what is in a leaked government report. Ahem! Festivito Aug 2016 #108
I never figured Wikileaks to be a front for Russian spying. Rex Aug 2016 #64
yep, I feel the same way about unindicted war criminals like Kissinger stupidicus Aug 2016 #71
K&R ismnotwasm Aug 2016 #77
It didn't used to be like that. It started when Assange became famous. Oneironaut Aug 2016 #82
Where can I find the Saudi cables JonLP24 Aug 2016 #87
Cryptome. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #89
Lock him up! Zambero Aug 2016 #90
Dumbass locked himself up. nt msanthrope Aug 2016 #91
But someone must be providing him with cocaine there ButterflyBlood Aug 2016 #92
I miss "The Memory Hole" Go Vols Aug 2016 #96
He and his organization have clearly jumped the shark! nt wolfie001 Aug 2016 #104
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WikiLeaks is a disgusting...»Reply #106