Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Please rec if you are ready to move on from the wikileaks story [View all]Response to renate (Reply #15)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
186 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

K&R! Let's not forget that the DNC and DWS preferred Hillary in 2008 - and Obama won. Why?
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#3
That's EXACTLY right! It is about the voters. People are still looking for a scapegoat
AgadorSparticus
Jul 2016
#7
Naw. With all the FREE publicity Sanders got, the debate schedule lost its importance. I know it's
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#34
"Let's not forget that the DNC and DWS preferred Hillary in 2008 - and Obama won"
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#31
It doesn't matter who was at the head of the DNC. Fact remains, the DNC overwhelmingly preferred
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#37
I kind of funny about people who attempt to skirt Rules on this site in order to
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#45
The threat of getting banned for here carries no weight with me whatsoever. nt
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#54
LOL." kind of funny about people who attempt to skirt Rules on this site in order to continue to
Snotcicles
Jul 2016
#60
Whatever you want to call it, it was NO threat. But I'm certain you know that. Btw? It was a
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#64
Oh give it a rest already with the conspiracy theorizing. Unless and until you've got proof
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#148
wait what? Have you read any of the emails that show impartiality was compromised?
uhnope
Jul 2016
#149
Wait, what? Do you have proof that anything mentioned in e-mails between two staffers ever came to
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#151
you're totally wrong. The emails show the DNC discussing how to sabotage Sander's campaign.
uhnope
Jul 2016
#153
Now you're really grasping. Sabotage?? Bwaaaaahahahahahaha! Words in electronic letters between a
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#159
And you thought wrong (no surprise there!). To make matters worse, you accuse ME
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#166
I've confronted many Putin shills & CTers on DU & you act & argue just like them. n/t
uhnope
Jul 2016
#171
I never said he wasn't. And I don't recall that the DNC showed any preference then
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#55
"So I'm in the camp of "let's move on." " I'm right there with you - and agree with your arguments
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#63
You are absolutely right, we can continue and support our candidates but some
Jim Beard
Jul 2016
#22
And you know this how? Gut feeling? Dislike of Hillary because of 25 yrs of Republican
BlueCaliDem
Jul 2016
#39
Does that include Sanders? Need I list the many infractions and illegalities of his campaign?
KittyWampus
Jul 2016
#27
+1 - I would have preferred to downvote the "Please rec if you are ready to move on"
erronis
Jul 2016
#66
I want the Democratic Party to rid itself of the horrible, NON-Democratic people who caused this.
Cooley Hurd
Jul 2016
#6
I feel the same way. I started voting straight Democratic earlier but I didn't have the opportunity
Jim Beard
Jul 2016
#28
Didn't you just write that Hillary should fuck herself and you will never vote for her?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#99
So you didn't mean it when you said you WERE voting for her, and now you are saying you didn't
Squinch
Jul 2016
#108
And before you said you WERE voting for her, didn't you also say then that you weren't voting
Squinch
Jul 2016
#110
Sorry, mostly disagree. It was more civil and issue-based compared to the GOP side,
R B Garr
Jul 2016
#92
Oh I wouldn't argue that there was plenty of unnecessary divisiveness, I just think that it was
WIProgressive88
Jul 2016
#100
if one reads the emails minus the Assange spin, there's no evidence of "conspiracy"
emulatorloo
Jul 2016
#84
not all of us are reading the Wikileaks Tweets and so they don't affect our conclusion that
uhnope
Jul 2016
#154
nope, they don't.. bout the tenth post I've read asking for proof where none is given
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#132
Yes the problems are serious and I think there are more where these came from.
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#52
Sorry this is too important to ignore. It is about who Democrats are and how we do business.
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#57
We can't afford to be distracted by quarrels and resentments; the consequences are too grim.
CBHagman
Jul 2016
#36
I'm not moving on until you stop calling it "the wikileaks" story as per the New Democrats orders.
bobthedrummer
Jul 2016
#69
A few snarky comments like we've all made in our professional and personal lives when
Fla Dem
Jul 2016
#88
You mean the wikileaks that Putin commissioned to help Trump? Those wikileaks?
Squinch
Jul 2016
#102
If you let it get talked out now it will disappear shortly. If you try to suppress it,
Yo_Mama
Jul 2016
#105
Nope. This needs to be properly investigated and ALL of the ratfuckers....
PoutrageFatigue
Jul 2016
#112
Or bullshit anecdotal statements taken as fact and 2143 ops based off of it. good try though
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#133
Fact not in dispute: There was no show of operational bias shown by the DNC before the lock up of
uponit7771
Jul 2016
#182
You're attempting to answer a different question than the one I asked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#183
Got it...we answer the questions we want to answer, not the ones actually being asked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#186
Move on if you'd like. That's not what the rest of the world is doing.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#121
You're wrong about that, bubble boy. Step outside the bubble and take a look. You'll be shocked.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jul 2016
#155
Just the MSM does as they are reporting on it - on all 3 stations 1st thing this AM. nt
jmg257
Jul 2016
#165
As our authoritarian wing so often says, DU is not representative of the country.
Marr
Jul 2016
#124
Needs to be federally investigated as an act of foreign sabotage of a US presidential election....
Hekate
Jul 2016
#128
When I came to DU 12 years ago, I didn't do it because it was a place where I could stick my head in
Hissyspit
Jul 2016
#138
Ethics and integrity don't matter as long as you repeat the mantra "I'm With Her".
Matt_in_STL
Jul 2016
#152
UNrec. This scandal goes to the heart of what's wrong with American democracy n/t
uhnope
Jul 2016
#142
I missed the part where politics is supposed to be "fair", but that's me...
Blue_Tires
Jul 2016
#174