Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)24-Year-Old Gets 3 Life Terms in Prison for Witnessing a Drug Deal: The Ugly Truth of Mandatory Drug [View all]
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/155794/24-year-old_gets_3_life_terms_in_prison_for_witnessing_a_drug_deal%3A_the_ugly_truth_of_mandatory_drug_sentencing/_640x428_310x220
Clarence Aaron is serving three life terms for a small-time college cocaine deal, another victim of heinous mandatory drug sentencing laws.
This is a simple truth: the United States is the only country in the first world that imposes life sentences to teenagers for small-time, non-violent drug offenses. In fact, the American legal system does so with alarming regularity, spending $40 billion a year to lock up hundreds of thousands of low-level dealers. The practice began when Ronald Reagan declared a "War on Drugs" in 1986, and has spread steadily since then. The following year, Congress enacted its federal mandatory sentencing guidelines, which automatically buried tens of thousands of low-level, non-violent drug offenders in the belly of the beast for decadeseven for multiple life terms. Just ask Clarence Aaron, inmate number 05070-003.
At the age of 24, Aaron was sentenced to three life terms for his role in a cocaine deal. That's effectively three times the sentence imposed upon Faisal Shahzad, who tried to set off a car bomb in Times Square in 2010. Aaron was a student and football player at Southern University in Baton Rouge. He'd never been arrested. In 1992, he made the mistake of being present for the sale of nine kilograms of cocaine and the conversion of one kilo of coke to crack. Aaron would have earned $1,500 for introducing the buyer and seller. He never actually touched the drugs.
Though his role was minor, Aaron received the longest sentence of anyone involved in the conspiracy when he refused to cooperate with authorities. His case gained national attention in 1999, when he appeared in "Snitch," a PBS Frontline documentary about prisoners serving long sentences after refusing to turn informant. Since then, a loose, bipartisan coalition of lawmakers and civil rights activists have championed efforts to have President Obama commute his sentence. But its now 2012 and Clarence Aaron is still locked up, despite the fact that the Federal Prosecutors Office that tried the case and the sentencing judge have supported immediate commutation. US District Court Judge Charles Butler, who sentenced Aaron, recently wrote, "Looking through the prism of hindsight, and considering the many factors argued by the defendant that were not present at the time of his initial sentencing, one can argue that a less harsh sentence might have been more equitable."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
62 replies, 12250 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (37)
ReplyReply to this post
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
24-Year-Old Gets 3 Life Terms in Prison for Witnessing a Drug Deal: The Ugly Truth of Mandatory Drug [View all]
xchrom
Jun 2012
OP
I'm not saying he wasn't in the wrong BUT this country is Fucked up! Life in Prison for DRUGS AND
lookingfortruth
Jun 2012
#1
I didn't see why he wouldn't turn snitch to save himself, supposedly, some jail time or
jp11
Jun 2012
#2
Yes one was a cold blooded murder and the other was a victimless crime.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jun 2012
#57
Drug dealing isn't a victimless crime. Let's see a link to your supposed "murderer" of a child
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#62
THIS is why I reject "the big tent". I can't find ANY common ground with this sort of thinking. nt
Romulox
Jun 2012
#29
You think it's a bad thing to cooperate with the law, when you're caught red handed?
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#41
Why not just execute the kid? It would be far more "compassionate" than caging him like an animal
Romulox
Jun 2012
#60
Yes, it's sad to think that you're in my tent. Someone who judges w/o the facts.
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#43
I am sitting here wondering why we clash so often when we agree on so much. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#54
LOL! How could a couple of milquetoast's like us be considered abrasive? n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#61
Our legal system has become completely insane with these outrageous mandatory sentencing guidelines
spicegal
Jun 2012
#4
Why is it I can assume he's Black? Why can't these laws be overthrown on grounds of racism?
marble falls
Jun 2012
#6
I agree. The drug policy is whats whack. And so are the people who support it.
marble falls
Jun 2012
#49
victim? What victim? I don't see a victim anywhere in that transaction.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2012
#51
What I am saying is "Where is the empathy for a obvious extreme miscarriage of justice."
RC
Jun 2012
#27
Private prisons love these types of laws. But then they wrote them for maximum
midnight
Jun 2012
#23
If he had only "cooperated"--identified which of his neighbors were jews--then maybe
Romulox
Jun 2012
#31
The American legal system is so f*!$ed up as to be beyond belief, we don't have a legal system.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2012
#38
If there was a serial killer who murdered joggers and pissed on their corpses
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Jun 2012
#56