Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Of course in simulations is the only way the F-35 performs to specs. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #1
Well, it's not as if it's seen any action yet, so how could it be otherwise? Just reading posts Jun 2016 #2
It doesn't even fly according to specs. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #3
Exactly. nt. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #5
Nailed it. brush Jun 2016 #6
I bet the MIC lobbyists... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #7
$100 million per plane, roughly. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #10
Most of those in the military... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #4
Well, as per Wikipedia it goes into full productin in a couple of years. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #8
Well, yes, but... Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #11
Not saying that deployment equals a good weapons platform, just pointing out that we appear to be Just reading posts Jun 2016 #13
Ahh ok. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #14
Just curious... did you fly fighters, Close Air Support, or some other military aircraft? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #15
As if! Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #9
Bingo. Else You Are Mad Jun 2016 #12
The old joke goes that a Cub Scout with a sling shot could knock one down. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #16
why, exactly, did they 'retire' the warthog? Gabi Hayes Jun 2016 #18
It's the old story that the Air Force feels it shouldn't be in the close ground support role. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #19
None of the F35s were shot down. They asphyxiated their pilots and crashed before it could happen. Oneironaut Jun 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»F-15E Strike Eagles unabl...»Reply #2