Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Family of AR-15 Inventor Eugene Stoner: He Didn't Intend It for Civilians [View all]Marengo
(3,477 posts)36. It seems I did misunderstand. I interpreted what you wrote as an agreement...
With the authors assertion that all gun owners have blood on their hands and that you were a contributor to the problem as discussed. A position which, coming from a gun owner, would not seem logical.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Family of AR-15 Inventor Eugene Stoner: He Didn't Intend It for Civilians [View all]
Blue_Adept
Jun 2016
OP
Probably. But, it was designed as a military weapon to use NATO's 7.62mm round.
JustABozoOnThisBus
Jun 2016
#5
They can say whatever they please, but it carries little authority if unsubstantiated...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#30
Even more predictable are the irrational emotional responses from the gun grabbers.
Bonx
Jun 2016
#8
I'm pretty sure I called it stupid gunnut nonsense, you can call it whatever you like
Major Nikon
Jun 2016
#38
True, the part that made the least sense was yours, which was a pretty good trick
Major Nikon
Jun 2016
#53
This device was DESIGNED to kill a lot of humans efficiently, this guy knows it
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#13