Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:06 AM Jan 2016

Those whose jobs depend on maintaining, "The military/industrial/congressional complex." [View all]

The Russian Federation has become an all-consuming boogeyman for many Pentagon and intelligence service employees charged with advising the U. S. government in regard to foreign policy. Russia is an international competitor with the United States in the fields of commerce and political influence, but is that really a valid reason to roundly demonize her leadership and put our national military on a nearly paranoid footing, with sky-high expectations of some kind of a Cold War style "sneak attack" from the implacable, though illusionary, "Russian Empire?" In the article quoted below, former CIA officer Philip Giraldi offers a imminently plausible explanation for this wide-spread logical disconnect.





The Pentagon.


Sabotage: US Officials 'Distort Image of Russia' to Keep Their Own Jobs

A whole array of US experts and officials create and use Russia's hostile image in order to hold down their jobs, former CIA officer Philip Giraldi, who is now executive director of the Council for the National Interest, said in his article published by the opinion journal American Conservative. He said that when in Moscow, he often met ordinary Russians who asked him why Washington hates Russians so much and "why does the American press seemingly have nothing good to say about them?" Giraldi admitted that he eventually failed give a clear-cut answer, even though he tried to attribute the problem to the political situation in Russia.

Touching upon the negative stance on Russia, Giraldi acknowledged that "there are many older Americans entrenched in the media and government as well as in the plentitude of think tanks who will always regard Russia as the enemy. And then there are the more cunning types who always need the threat of an enemy to keep their well-paid jobs in the government itself and also within the punditry, both of which rely on the health and well-being of the military-industrial-congressional complex," he said.

He also wondered why those in the White House and the US media fail to realize the fact that "a good relationship with Russia is indispensable."

Giraldi touted Russia as a good partner in Syria and a driving force to hold current talks on resolving the Syrian gridlock. In addition, Russia "has consistently been a reliable ally against terrorism, in recognition of its own vulnerability to ISIS and other Islamic militants, One does not have to love Mother Russia or Vladimir Putin to appreciate that it is in America's interest to develop a cooperative relationship based on shared interests," Giraldi pointed out.

(snip)




Read more at: http://sputniknews.com/world/20160110/1032897666/united-states-russia-image.html



60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations, Banks And Their Media Minions And MIC Henchmen cantbeserious Jan 2016 #1
Hear! Hear! another_liberal Jan 2016 #2
I so agree newfie11 Jan 2016 #6
you must not be getting your require dose of the TV SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #9
Likely applies to all of the MIC. There would be so many jobs lost if world tensions RKP5637 Jan 2016 #3
Yes, I have no doubt . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #4
Mark Thomas Comedy product. Bad Dog Jan 2016 #5
"A bit dated," perhaps . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #12
The Pitfalls of Peace Octafish Jan 2016 #7
And if the one percent of our very rich didn't demand to live like Roman Emperors . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #10
If only there were an organization big enough to address such a problem. Octafish Jan 2016 #16
Eloquently illustrated . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #20
+1 dmr Jan 2016 #32
The US and Russia are the world's #1 and #2 top exporters of weapons of war, 31% US, 27% Russia Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #8
Think of all the engineering genius, developmental investment, and production capacity wasted . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #11
In both the US and in Russia. That's the part that is missing from your OP. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #13
Every hour of every day . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #14
A creative rationalize for your conspicuous and relevant absence. LanternWaste Jan 2016 #39
Aren't we in a suspicious mood today . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #40
Or on this very board. GGJohn Jan 2016 #41
Careful! another_liberal Jan 2016 #44
Oh, I believe somebody already has. GGJohn Jan 2016 #45
That's a very good point (nt) Recursion Jan 2016 #30
The new bogeyman is not Russia treestar Jan 2016 #15
Too true . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #19
Nice Putinist source you got there. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #17
Nice character assassination . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #18
Russia's a paper tiger who'd be nothing if not surrounded by countries lacking viable militaries. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #21
If you really think that is so . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #22
I spent ten years in the US Military. Long enough to be unafraid of Russia. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #23
How similar those claims are to some others made about Russia . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #24
Here's a hint for ya... re the last line of your post: Armies haven't marched for decades. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #25
Your argument is singularly unconvincing . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #28
Nobody is marching on Moscow. dmr Jan 2016 #33
Good! another_liberal Jan 2016 #34
That's some potent neo-con crack. nilesobek Jan 2016 #54
You really are clueless. GGJohn Jan 2016 #55
GG nilesobek Jan 2016 #56
The point is that in a conventional war, Russia would lose and lose badly, GGJohn Jan 2016 #57
You just aren't very well informed. nilesobek Jan 2016 #58
The point is we don't WANT to occupy Russia. To what end? Occupy Russia? IGNORE Russia. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #59
9 of the top ten largest nilesobek Jan 2016 #60
Despite being government propaganda - when you waste money at the trillion dollar level Rex Jan 2016 #26
You post things like "Pooty Poot," and still . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #27
Why do you assume anyone cares what you think? Rex Jan 2016 #31
And . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #35
You post nothing but Russian propaganda, using Russian owned "news" sources, GGJohn Jan 2016 #37
I post the stories I find important . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #46
You post Russian propaganda, which I guess you find important GGJohn Jan 2016 #48
I'm not the one "pushing an agenda". . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #51
This is laughable. GGJohn Jan 2016 #52
Oh Sputniknews. Where would we be without you? Recursion Jan 2016 #29
Fox News! another_liberal Jan 2016 #36
Sputnik News is a wholly created, owned and run by the Russian govt for the espress GGJohn Jan 2016 #38
That is your belief . . . another_liberal Jan 2016 #42
Not a belief, but a fact. GGJohn Jan 2016 #43
You wonder? another_liberal Jan 2016 #47
Oh, I know, just wondering if you'll confirm it. eom GGJohn Jan 2016 #49
Calling me a liar again? another_liberal Jan 2016 #50
And I will repeat myself again. GGJohn Jan 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those whose jobs depend o...