Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More Baby Boomers Facing Old Age Alone [View all]jtuck004
(15,882 posts)38. Thank you for the ideas... n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Woah, I'm NOT pushing zero population growth. I'm pointing out one of its nasty side-effects.
Zalatix
May 2012
#28
Zero population growth means averaging 2 children per couple. It does not mean having no children
Cal33
May 2012
#31
Or so they think. I would trade all the wealth in the world for the real life community I have.
Zalatix
May 2012
#22
That job is a calling. A lot of people simply aren't suited for that kind of work.
Zalatix
May 2012
#30
55, Divorced, No Kids - I Am The Statistic Referenced In The Article - The Last Years Will Be Rough
cantbeserious
May 2012
#6
That's a fine idea, but lacking in reality, IMO. Hippies were young, strong and able.
CTyankee
May 2012
#23
I think the problem with that plan is that a community composed entirely of old people may
HiPointDem
May 2012
#7
My dad always wished I would get married so I would have someone to take care of me in my old age...
DesertDiamond
May 2012
#5
I was going to say, two can live cheaper than one, and you don't have to be married
JDPriestly
May 2012
#8
Nest empty, divorced 12 years, last four serious girlfriends turned out to be hopelessly damaged.
slackmaster
May 2012
#40