Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
29. No they don't
Sat May 26, 2012, 11:56 AM
May 2012

Satellites provide wide area scans and are pretty useless for the 1 meter resolution you need for the most of the jobs I mentioned. Some satellites can do 1 m resolution but they are rare and usually used by security agencies - they remain pretty much useless when there is cloud cover.

Helicopters can do the work as can light aircraft but they are horribly expensive both for purchase and in operation. This restricts them to being used in reaction to events - not to detect them. They and some aircraft are used for things like reflection IR scanning for illegal crops (do not grow hemp, for fibre of course, without a good overhead screen and accept the loss of yield). Additionally you cannot have manned aircraft of any sort working too close together and with fewer for an area your detection ability goes down rapidly. Drones can be programmed for such close coordination flying. Remember also that not all "drones" are large and could be operated from small vans or boats.

I believe the GUBMINT has already had stationary camera platforms that were remotely piloted. cherokeeprogressive May 2012 #1
Texas isn't America. Or so Texas says, anyway. n/t Ian David May 2012 #2
Quite a broad brush you got there! MagickMuffin May 2012 #45
Watching the Watchbirds Ian David May 2012 #3
Have any of these idiots ever seen Terminator? DJ13 May 2012 #4
Did You Catch This: WillyT May 2012 #5
Yup, saw that. Zalatix May 2012 #6
Although I agree that Meiko May 2012 #7
What?! Are you not aware of the thousands being killed in the Middle East with drones? Luminous Animal May 2012 #10
I think Meiko knows that, but Zalatix May 2012 #11
That's true Meiko May 2012 #20
There's an easy solution to that. Zalatix May 2012 #22
Anything is possible Meiko May 2012 #24
The military and cia budgets for the most brand new highs-zoot drones means there are thousands sad sally May 2012 #50
Police departments have "Budgets"? BiggJawn May 2012 #33
I was making Meiko May 2012 #17
Oh we can keep an eye on them alright zeemike May 2012 #15
Actually I wouldn't Meiko May 2012 #18
They'll make great targets.... and when you are pointing up it will 2on2u May 2012 #25
Sorry we blew up you're house, we thought it was AL-CIA-DUH. sarcasmo May 2012 #8
The computer mis-read the address. RC May 2012 #9
+1 sarcasmo May 2012 #28
What could possibley go wrong? AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #12
Many LE Meiko May 2012 #19
Seattle Police Department is getting them. nt gateley May 2012 #13
I remember a few years ago listeners of Coast to Coast sent in some pics of these gateley May 2012 #14
Thank GAWD! I was all worked up over NOTHING! EFerrari May 2012 #16
So what is being said is that armed drones are NOT allowed intaglio May 2012 #21
Actually Meiko May 2012 #23
No they don't intaglio May 2012 #29
You make some valid points Meiko May 2012 #35
Um. Robb May 2012 #41
You are mainly talking about active scanning intaglio May 2012 #46
"Floating truant officers"?? n/t 2on2u May 2012 #26
This is what one may need to protect one's privacy and or life and limb. 2on2u May 2012 #27
And if you are stupid enough to build one of these intaglio May 2012 #32
Hey you are the one funding it, you me and all the rest who buy 2on2u May 2012 #34
EMP weapons as such have been around since the 80s intaglio May 2012 #38
Private individuals are able to posess rifles, pesticides and Hostess 2on2u May 2012 #39
EMP ain't focused, they are approximately directional intaglio May 2012 #40
I'm in a field near my house, a drone with hellfire missiles is peering 2on2u May 2012 #49
Except the guy with the pacemaker intaglio May 2012 #51
I don't know.... there is talk of arming them.... and I sort of do look 2on2u May 2012 #52
I'll probably use the drone defense. Didn't know they were there, didn't really 2on2u May 2012 #36
Yah, well, good luck with that. MineralMan May 2012 #53
Well yes, yes it is. n/t 2on2u May 2012 #54
Yeah. It won't be like all those times they raid the wrong house. Octafish May 2012 #30
Interestingly enough, this report is from Fox News. MineralMan May 2012 #31
I suspect if the president was a Republican right now though that Fox News would be pro armed drones cstanleytech May 2012 #42
I don't think so. MineralMan May 2012 #43
Umm cstanleytech May 2012 #47
Tinfoil hats felix_numinous May 2012 #37
Wow! DeSwiss May 2012 #44
Two of my past posts on this: Zorra May 2012 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey tinfoil hatters, we'l...»Reply #29