Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Noam Chomsky Nails Why the GOP Has Fallen Off the Deep End [View all]
http://www.alternet.org/noam-chomsky-nails-why-gop-has-fallen-deep-end"The Republican party, about twenty years ago, basically abandoned any pretense of being a normal political party," Chomsky noted. "Their only policies are don't do anything or bomb. That's not a political party."
Chomsky described how Republicans gravitated toward an increasingly radical base in the 1980s and '90s.
"[Republicans] became so dedicated to the interests of the extreme wealthy and powerful that they couldn't get votes. So they had to turn to other constituencies, which were always there but were never politically mobilized. So they turned to Christian evangelicals, the nativists who are afraid they're taking our country away from us. People who are so terrified they have to carry a gun in a coffee shop."
The Democratic party has also undergone a profound transformation.
"Today's mainstream Democrats are pretty much what used to be called Republicans. Somebody like Eisenhower would be considered way out on the left," he noted, explaining that Eisenhower supported New Deal programs, while modern-day Republicans are eternally trying to gut the safety net.
Chomsky described how Republicans gravitated toward an increasingly radical base in the 1980s and '90s.
"[Republicans] became so dedicated to the interests of the extreme wealthy and powerful that they couldn't get votes. So they had to turn to other constituencies, which were always there but were never politically mobilized. So they turned to Christian evangelicals, the nativists who are afraid they're taking our country away from us. People who are so terrified they have to carry a gun in a coffee shop."
The Democratic party has also undergone a profound transformation.
"Today's mainstream Democrats are pretty much what used to be called Republicans. Somebody like Eisenhower would be considered way out on the left," he noted, explaining that Eisenhower supported New Deal programs, while modern-day Republicans are eternally trying to gut the safety net.
I would surmise that Hillary is to the far right of Eisenhower. Think about that, Clintonistas.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
65 replies, 6419 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (41)
ReplyReply to this post
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just following the pattern of the Clintonistas constant cheap shots against Bernie.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2015
#7
You clearly don't get Hillary. Ike warned us about the MIC. When has Hillary done that?
Scuba
Oct 2015
#37
Would you like to lay out 10 or 20 issues and show us what Ike and her positions are?
randys1
Oct 2015
#38
No, you are the one who claims Hillary is to the right. So I need prove nothing.
randys1
Oct 2015
#50
Pro-war, pro-Wall Street, pro-fracking, pro-Keystone XL, pro-H1B Visas. Too far right for me.
Scuba
Oct 2015
#61
So still nothing. How about admit your statement is wrong, and that she is still too
randys1
Oct 2015
#62
I don't. He was a very good and fair man. Probably before Hillary was.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2015
#10
Gee, how cool is it for the Democratic Party to have marriage equality to brag about! What would you
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#58
Anyone who claims Hillary is to the right of IKE needs to be challenged. Please
randys1
Oct 2015
#28
In all sincerity, I say things exaggerated and get called on it myself, so my goal
randys1
Oct 2015
#46
It could have been very interesting if the Clintonistas hadn't tried to trash it.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2015
#42
as surmise means to infer without evidence, your prophecy is no more nor no less valid
LanternWaste
Oct 2015
#18
"Clintonistas"??? That's enough of that goddamned shit!!! What the hell does that even mean
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#20
I'm just copying the "childish" taunt of Sandernistas I see here all the time!
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2015
#32
Once the Clintonistas stop calling us Sandernistas, I will be happy to stop.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2015
#30
Two wrongs don't make it right. I don't care who started it. Do you know that derisive (let's be
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2015
#44
"Today's mainstream Democrats are pretty much what used to be called Republicans."
villager
Oct 2015
#26
And as the repub party falls apart, the "sane" ones may end up moving to our side.
arcane1
Oct 2015
#29
So then will sane Demos -- who have a memory of what the Demo party was -- get to move, too?
villager
Oct 2015
#31
H. and B.Clinton are both to the far right of Ike. B.Clinton governed well to the right of Nixon. We
Attorney in Texas
Oct 2015
#66