Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the Obama administration is going to allow the Alaska wilderness to be destroyed. [View all]Baclava
(12,047 posts)2. Can't we just seize the Saudi's oilfields instead?
Billions of dollars in weapons we waste blowing up mud huts when much juicier targets are available.
We can share the oil with NATO when we take them over, nobody should mind.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So the Obama administration is going to allow the Alaska wilderness to be destroyed. [View all]
MadHound
May 2012
OP
I just heard about this yesterday and I am disgusted. I guess Obama wants to be an Oil President as
avaistheone1
May 2012
#6
You need to stop being a "hater" and a "basher" and whatever other words my 11 yr old niece
Dragonfli
May 2012
#11
I'm sure I'll soon be told this isn't true, and even if it was, it is somehow a good thing...
KG
May 2012
#15
Let's see.... 'clean coal', drill-baby-drill, let's license some more nukes...
SnoopDog
May 2012
#20
It must somehow make it different, under a Repug we would not feel so lonely opposing it
Dragonfli
May 2012
#22
Great, great...the OP sophistry is established by the phrase "it will be"...
uponit7771
May 2012
#44
Another Republican issue stolen! What a master of the craft!!!!! Go Team!!!!
Karmadillo
May 2012
#23