HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Wyden (D-Ore) revolts ove... » Reply #17

Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Original post)

Thu May 24, 2012, 02:37 PM

17. Obama's trade rep Ron Kirk is a sociopathic liar and corporate tool

Absolutely no different than the worst of Bush's stooges:



http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120516/01342918937/dear-ron-kirk-transparency-isnt-hearing-critics-its-telling-public-what-youre-doing.shtml

Dear Ron Kirk: Transparency Isn't Hearing From Critics, It's Telling The Public What You're Doing

We've been spending a lot of time talking about just how secretive the USTR (led by its boss Ron Kirk) has been concerning the TPP negotiations. However, what may be even worse isn't just Ron Kirk's stonewalling, it's the fact that he either does not know what transparency means, or is playing dumb when confronted on the issue. Last week, we noted that his response to a letter from legal scholars requesting more transparency insulted the intelligence of those scholars, when he said he was "insulted" himself by the claim that the USTR was not transparent in the TPP negotiations. As evidence of his supposed transparency, he noted: "USTR has conducted in excess of 400 consultations with Congressional and private stakeholders on the TPP, including inviting stakeholders to all of the twelve negotiating rounds."

We already noted that he was playing word games here and being disingenuous, but it's even worse than that. As Sherwyn Siy properly points out, what Kirk is pointing out isn't transparency. All he's talking about is hearing various opinions -- not sharing what the USTR is actually doing. As Siy points out transparency is about information flow in the other direction:

This is a key point that needs to be made about transparency—it's not about whether or not the government has the relevant opinions of the public. Transparency is about the flow of information the other way—information about the workings of government being visible to the people it is supposed to represent. That is precisely what is lacking in this process. This should be an obvious point, but it's one that Kirk's response either fundamentally misunderstands or deliberately sidesteps. So long as no actual proposed text comes to light (you know, the way draft laws and international treaties are published), the process remains opaque, and no amount of input from whatever stakeholders into the TPP process makes up for a lack of real information flowing the other way.

Until Ron Kirk is willing to address that point, his disingenuous and insulting claims about how many meetings he's holding are meaningless fluff from someone who is avoiding his official duty as a representative of the American public.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 32 replies Author Time Post
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 OP
MannyGoldstein May 2012 #1
Angry Dragon May 2012 #2
WillyT May 2012 #21
jannyk May 2012 #3
Arugula Latte May 2012 #5
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #10
stevedeshazer May 2012 #23
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #24
stevedeshazer May 2012 #28
dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #4
Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #6
hay rick May 2012 #7
Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #9
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #15
Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #8
leftyohiolib May 2012 #11
Tierra_y_Libertad May 2012 #12
patrice May 2012 #13
Peace Patriot May 2012 #14
HiPointDem May 2012 #16
LineReply Obama's trade rep Ron Kirk is a sociopathic liar and corporate tool
brentspeak May 2012 #17
bvar22 May 2012 #18
pa28 May 2012 #19
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #22
pampango May 2012 #20
whathehell May 2012 #31
progressoid May 2012 #25
JDPriestly May 2012 #26
snot May 2012 #27
inna May 2012 #29
bl968 May 2012 #30
AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #32
Please login to view edit histories.