Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Civil War Really Was About Slavery. Really. It Was. [View all]C Moon
(12,259 posts)8. I've never talked to anyone or read about this, but I was annoyed at Shelby Foote's attitude in
Last edited Tue Jul 14, 2015, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)
the PBS documentary, "Civil War."
I know the director probably wanted an unbiased view of the event, but Foote to me seemed more sympathetic to the south, rather than to those who were living in slavery.
I just looked him up (RIP, he passed in 2005) and that site said, "Foote did not hesitate to affirm that he would have fought for the south; when he used the term "southerner" he meant "white southerner."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
And the north promoted segregation, kept blacks from voting for nearly a century...
951-Riverside
Jul 2015
#1
in "gone with the wind", rhett butler points out, before the war is declared, that all
niyad
Jul 2015
#23
I've never talked to anyone or read about this, but I was annoyed at Shelby Foote's attitude in
C Moon
Jul 2015
#8
They want to claim the Confederacy was about "Southern hospitality" too....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2015
#10
Here in Nashville, I was taught it was fought over slavery as that was the hottest
Uncle Joe
Jul 2015
#68
That makes it sound like the Southern and border states were arguing against state power
Uncle Joe
Jul 2015
#73
Secession was definitely about slavery. The war that followed had more complex reasons behind it
onenote
Jul 2015
#20
The war was started because the North would not cooperate with the South regarding slavery
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#24
Of course it was. The only thing they say today is it was economic - of course - they were
jwirr
Jul 2015
#22
Lincoln's call for militia troops, after the attack on Fort Sumner, was based on the Militia Act
struggle4progress
Jul 2015
#64
The secession of NC is noteworthy because a referendum had already decided decisively against it,
struggle4progress
Jul 2015
#65
They also fought for the right to be slave holders themselves, one day. From a 50,000 ft view
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#36
Yes, and you can hear the echoes of that arg in the "freedom of religion" debate in which
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#42
ANY time that "states' rights" thing comes up - it's all about sanitizing racism. lee atwater
calimary
Jul 2015
#45
great point and most recently, the racism behind the campaign "protecting against voter fraud".
whereisjustice
Jul 2015
#50