Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 04:13 PM Jun 2015

Hillary Clinton needs to take a stand on the Trans-Pacific Partnership [View all]

Just helping get the word out here, that Clinton has not taken a stand. If she doesn't have an opinion yet on something this huge, then she isn't qualified to be president.

Now, I believe she almost certainly has an opinion, she's far too intelligent not to. So, why is she silent? Possible reasons:

1) She supports it. She doesn't want to say it though, because it will hurt her with the left, especially union voters (and rightfully so). I believe there's an 80% chance this is the reason.

2) She opposes it. She is silent because this will put her at odds with the President. Sure, she's polling way ahead of everyone, but if Biden runs and Obama supports him, her support erodes fast. 18% chance this is the reason for her silence.

3) She really has no idea if she supports it or not, or something else. 2% chance.

So, what do you think she does? She can't stay silent forever. My guess is she comes out with a half-assed answer, like "There are many bad things in this trade deal, and I would have pushed for blah blah, but I'd grudgingly support this bill if I were president. It's better than no deal."

I support Bernie, but there are circumstances where I can support her. There is no way I will vote for her if she comes up with that reason and talks on both sides of her mouth.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She already has leftofcool Jun 2015 #1
She doesn't have to read it in full Reter Jun 2015 #4
Annnnnd.....when are you declaring your candidacy?? MADem Jun 2015 #11
Why doesn't she stand up and demand it be made public, so she snagglepuss Jun 2015 #7
She is still under oath. She can't. leftofcool Jun 2015 #9
that is false. cali Jun 2015 #13
Are you saying that because she is under oath she cannot state publicly snagglepuss Jun 2015 #24
I believe it does. She is quite limited in what can or can not be said. leftofcool Jun 2015 #27
This is passed over as never been said. It will probably be ask again tomorrow. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #8
actually,she fully endorsed it last fall in her book. cali Jun 2015 #12
She won't but there was a hint of support in her speech cali Jun 2015 #2
I agree but acknowledge that many people like me who prefer someone else will not beleve pampango Jun 2015 #3
She's evolving. Which direction she's evolving is being kept secret until she's finished evolving. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #5
That's evolution for you Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #29
Reports have already said (on NPR several weeks ago)... Sancho Jun 2015 #6
Good post, it is easier to live with the truth rather than believing the cognitive dissonance Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #10
being under oath does not preclude her from asking that it be made public cali Jun 2015 #14
What she discussed in her book has been changing... Sancho Jun 2015 #15
lol. try to divert much, hon? cali Jun 2015 #16
You continue to "bash" without substance... Sancho Jun 2015 #17
I didn't know about the tuition equity issue. lunamagica Jun 2015 #19
Please make this into an OP, Sancho. Control-Z Jun 2015 #18
I agree , make it into an OP, please. lunamagica Jun 2015 #21
It's not simply corporate "influence". It's Corporate World Government. Faryn Balyncd Jun 2015 #23
Sorry, I don't assume that the TPP is the key to world domination by corporations... Sancho Jun 2015 #28
Agree with your last paragraph (and would rate Supreme Court appointments Faryn Balyncd Jun 2015 #31
She making a plan to make a plan to announce her position on it... 99Forever Jun 2015 #20
I can only assume, based on your post that you Evergreen Emerald Jun 2015 #22
No Reter Jun 2015 #30
As I see it, she can say as little as possible and possibly tick off some supporters, Buns_of_Fire Jun 2015 #25
In her book she supported it. onecaliberal Jun 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton needs to ...