Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)

6. Why should she?

Reply to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

Fri Jun 12, 2015, 05:54 PM

Jun 2015

By election time, it will either be dead or enacted.
And, if she did say she was against it, it wouldn't change one mind of an avid Sanders supporter.
If you wouldn't vote for her in the general election because of her stance, and instead voted green etc or stayed home, then
well... that's on you.

Additionally she has stated her position. Unlike Sanders and members of congress she has not seen the actual bill.
Her last work with it was 5 years ago in a draft stage.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will Hillary Clinton take a position on the TPP tomorrow? [View all] MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 OP

Not one without lots of weasel words, wiggle room and plausible deniabilities. Scuba Jun 2015 #1

Manny, Manny, Manny! marym625 Jun 2015 #2

It doesn't matter much, it is too late. If voters are satisfied with ambiguity when they Jefferson23 Jun 2015 #3

Very good point marym625 Jun 2015 #4

will ir be missonary ? olddots Jun 2015 #5

Why should she? OKNancy Jun 2015 #6

I thought that she worked for it when SOS? haikugal Jun 2015 #8

As I wrote... 5 years ago in the draft stage OKNancy Jun 2015 #9

Well there you are, right? haikugal Jun 2015 #10

she may take several positions. Motown_Johnny Jun 2015 #7