Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Orrex

(63,582 posts)

5. Whatever its age, it's a smarmy corporatist buzzword.

Reply to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #4)

Sun May 31, 2015, 04:01 PM

May 2015

It positively reeks of insincerity and affected cool.

For what it's worth, I also find the phrase "sea change" grating and overused, but Shakespeare himself thought it was just dandy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Any candidate who uses the word "optics" instead of "appearances" has lost my vote. [View all] Orrex May 2015 OP

"worries about the public perception of a decision more than the substance of the decision itself." cui bono May 2015 #1

If candidates are more worried about optics than substance, we will sink further into this quagmire BrotherIvan May 2015 #2

You place too much emphasis on atmospherics pscot May 2015 #3

I really do not understand where people come up with this anger nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #4

Whatever its age, it's a smarmy corporatist buzzword. Orrex May 2015 #5

Because it came out of academic writing actually nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #9

We're going to have to disagree Orrex May 2015 #12

I get anoyed when people say life style olddots May 2015 #6

George Carlin famously commented on exactly that word. Orrex May 2015 #7

Ha! lovemydog May 2015 #10

What if they wear a flag pin for the optics during their appearances? FSogol May 2015 #8

Optics doesn't mean appearance nichomachus May 2015 #11