General Discussion

(5,166 posts)

2. I heard - don't know where- on TV, I believe- that if the

Mon May 25, 2015, 07:52 PM

May 2015

Supremes vote against the ACA, the subsidies would remain in effect for one year.
Has anyone else heard that scenario?
Is that plausible?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I heard - don't know where- on TV, I believe- that if the No Vested Interest May 2015 #2

it would entirely be up to the SCOTUS dsc May 2015 #4

There's a simpler answer than looking at who appointed which Justice. Jim Lane May 2015 #8

That's a good way of looking at at it. Thank you for pointing it out./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #9

But will our party leadership do that? blackspade May 2015 #24

Republicans will dance in the streets. graegoyle May 2015 #5

I hope your title is a typo. Ms. Toad May 2015 #13

+1 nt Quackers May 2015 #31

That assumes the candidate 47of74 May 2015 #21

Are we talking about the same party? nt awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #33

How would they even know? nxylas May 2015 #35

Yep. They shut down the government and suffered NOTHING. Arugula Latte May 2015 #14

Are millions ready to go back to no insurance lovuian May 2015 #10

Fascinating lark May 2015 #16

Legislative intent is clear as a bell in this case. dawg May 2015 #18

We're seeing an increasing difference in outcomes IronLionZion May 2015 #23

The lies caught up with them.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #28

why have 'state exchanges' in the first place? quadrature May 2015 #29

Its a simple fix if they gut it. Kablooie May 2015 #30

No, the dumb asses awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #32

Scalia, Thomas and Alito will vote to gut it no matter what DFW May 2015 #34