Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How the Media Misrepresent Obama’s “Fast Track” “Secret” International Trade Deals [View all]
TPP, TTIP and TISA: How the Media Misrepresent Obamas Fast Track Secret International Trade Deals
5/7/2015
Both conservative and liberal news media misrepresent U.S. President Barack Obamas proposed international trade-deals as if they were about only such things as lowering tariffs and reducing national trade-protectionism which are relatively minor surface-features of these huge proposed treaties: TTIP with Europe, TPP with Asia, and TISA (Trade in Services Agreement). All of these proposed Obama trade-deals are actually about transferring to panels of international corporations the powers that currently reside in the various individual nations regulatory and legal authorities i.e., that reside in the democratic governments that are accountable to the population that elected them instead of to the few global billionaires who control the international corporations.
...For example, if you will google-seach in one-and-the-same search the two phrases together fast track was passed bill was defeated you will get the following: No results found for fast track was passed bill was defeated.
The reason why this is the case is laid out in the book by Public Citizen, The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority. It explains that Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was created by President Nixon in order to get around something: to get around the U.S. Constitutions having placed Americas treaty-making authority in a balance-of-powers framework with Congress, something that the Constitution did in order to prevent the emergence of dictatorship by excessive power in the hands of the federal Executive, the President (which dictatorship was Nixons goal to achieve.
Only 16 times since Nixon was in the White House has his Fast-Track TPA been applied, and yet hundreds of free-trade agreements have passed Congress without any need for (or application of) Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority during that time. How and why has this been so, and why does the public not know these crucially important things?
TPA, or Fast Track, is the device that is used only when a President wants to ram through Congress a trade-deal that would never be able to pass Congress under the traditional, and fully Constitutional, method, because these are the few trade-deals that have provisions in them that, for the typical member of Congress, would cause him or her to lose the congressional seat if he or she didnt at least try to get the bill amended before it was passed. In other words: only fascistic, or outrageously pro mega-corporate, trade deals, need TPA in order for them to pass Congress. Thats why Nixon initiated TPA. It works as he intended it would.
In Congress, to vote for TPA is to vote for the trade-deal thats about to be fast-tracked; and to vote against TPA is to vote against that trade-deal....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-tpp-and-ttip-how-the-media-misrepresent-fast-track-secret-international-trade-deals/5447839
5/7/2015
Both conservative and liberal news media misrepresent U.S. President Barack Obamas proposed international trade-deals as if they were about only such things as lowering tariffs and reducing national trade-protectionism which are relatively minor surface-features of these huge proposed treaties: TTIP with Europe, TPP with Asia, and TISA (Trade in Services Agreement). All of these proposed Obama trade-deals are actually about transferring to panels of international corporations the powers that currently reside in the various individual nations regulatory and legal authorities i.e., that reside in the democratic governments that are accountable to the population that elected them instead of to the few global billionaires who control the international corporations.
...For example, if you will google-seach in one-and-the-same search the two phrases together fast track was passed bill was defeated you will get the following: No results found for fast track was passed bill was defeated.
The reason why this is the case is laid out in the book by Public Citizen, The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority. It explains that Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was created by President Nixon in order to get around something: to get around the U.S. Constitutions having placed Americas treaty-making authority in a balance-of-powers framework with Congress, something that the Constitution did in order to prevent the emergence of dictatorship by excessive power in the hands of the federal Executive, the President (which dictatorship was Nixons goal to achieve.
Only 16 times since Nixon was in the White House has his Fast-Track TPA been applied, and yet hundreds of free-trade agreements have passed Congress without any need for (or application of) Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority during that time. How and why has this been so, and why does the public not know these crucially important things?
TPA, or Fast Track, is the device that is used only when a President wants to ram through Congress a trade-deal that would never be able to pass Congress under the traditional, and fully Constitutional, method, because these are the few trade-deals that have provisions in them that, for the typical member of Congress, would cause him or her to lose the congressional seat if he or she didnt at least try to get the bill amended before it was passed. In other words: only fascistic, or outrageously pro mega-corporate, trade deals, need TPA in order for them to pass Congress. Thats why Nixon initiated TPA. It works as he intended it would.
In Congress, to vote for TPA is to vote for the trade-deal thats about to be fast-tracked; and to vote against TPA is to vote against that trade-deal....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obamas-tpp-and-ttip-how-the-media-misrepresent-fast-track-secret-international-trade-deals/5447839
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
31 replies, 2363 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the Media Misrepresent Obama’s “Fast Track” “Secret” International Trade Deals [View all]
RiverLover
May 2015
OP
This cannot be said enough - and is contrary to the "oh, this is ALWAYS how this is done" lies -
djean111
May 2015
#1
Yes, and it's extremely disappointing to see Obama promote this so heavily
Fast Walker 52
May 2015
#23
Another article critical of ISDS, a dispute mechanism in over 2500 trade agreements since 1959.
Hoyt
May 2015
#2
I have found that when people resort to "ooooh", they really have nothing substantive to say.
djean111
May 2015
#4
So many people in Europe have protested the TTIP (50000+), they are having to renegotiate TTIP
RiverLover
May 2015
#11
It gives corporations power over local govts AND not just through the evil ISDS
RiverLover
May 2015
#5
In what alternate reality would ANY fucking "arbitraters" being "chosen" by corporations...
99Forever
May 2015
#21
Just take the mental quantum leap to Ronald Reaganistan. They tell me its nice there. nt
raouldukelives
May 2015
#26
Well without well regulated companies, most of us would be living a Great Depression
Hoyt
May 2015
#29
I'm impressed Bloomberg published this. Thanks for adding it to this thread!
RiverLover
May 2015
#18
I'm sorry, but I can't take global research seriously as they are very creepy about LGBT issues.
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#30