Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No, the shootings are in no way excusable [View all]MellowDem
(5,018 posts)56. It's not like the body guard didn't know the risk...
I don't see why you would blame Geller though, it was definitely the shooter's fault.
Again, if violence is never an excuse, of course she's a victim for being the target of violence. Doesn't matter of the person hoped to provoke a violent response for some other ended, if all it takes is their offensive speech, it's not an excuse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
beheading non believers is also considered the right thing to do in certain religions nt
msongs
May 2015
#1
Forcing children to do without medical care or medicine is also the "right thing to do",
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#2
Our close allies, the Saudis, seem to think it's the right thing to do for practically any transgression
whatchamacallit
May 2015
#3
No be "brave", if that's how you want to characterize Geller's provocation,
whatchamacallit
May 2015
#14
Nor do I. She's a savvy individual, and knows precisely which bottom-feeders will accept the bait
LanternWaste
May 2015
#9
If she knowingly and intentionally contributed to the violence and actually sought that result....
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#84
In short... You think that words and 'incitement' are enough to justify violence...
Oktober
May 2015
#35
Can you please explain to me what exactly you think I'm trying to justify here?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#53
It should be noted that Geller's group *organized* the event. She herself was not a participant.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#69
Will you please give it up with the whole "short skirt" analogy? That's a non-starter.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#72
Did the ACLU/NAACP/Code Pink/whatever want to see a violent response that placed people in danger?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#74
If she's claiming victimhood status--and guess what, she is--it does motivate her.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#78
They do - there's more room to debate because Geller is such a reprehensible person
el_bryanto
May 2015
#30
It is not an American tradition to insult and vilify an entire other religion, is it? Free speech
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#46