Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 09:17 PM Apr 2015

Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Pros and Cons [View all]

First off, what is it:

The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, is a proposed free trade agreement between the U.S and 11 other trading partners bordering the Pacific Ocean. Current trade between the countries is $1.5 trillion in goods (2012 estimate) and $242 billion in services (2011 estimate). Once approved, it would be bigger than the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), currently the world’s largest free trade area. It would be slightly smaller than the other large regional trade agreement being negotiated, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the U.S. and the European Union.

The TPP is between Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the U.S. and Vietnam. The countries involved are responsible for 40% of the world's total GDP of $88 trillion, 26% of its trade, and 793 million of its consumers.

Notably, the agreement excludes China. It's meant to balance the trade dominance of both China and India in East Asia. It also provides a trade alliance that gives the U.S. an excuse to intervene in trade disputes in the oil-rich South China Sea. Like most other trade agreements, it removes tariffs on goods and services, and sets reciprocal trade quotas. Unlike most agreements, but like the TTIP, it removes non-tariff blocks to trade and harmonizes regulations and statutes.

The TPP covers a wide range of goods and services, including financial services, telecommunications and even food safety standards. In this way, it affects foreign policy and even laws within countries. For example, it suggests that countries set up an agency like the U.S. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to analyze the costs and benefits of new regulations.

http://useconomy.about.com/od/Trade-Agreements/fl/What-Is-the-Trans-Pacific-Partnership.htm

Anyone feel free to post better explanations of it, if you have it! Thanks.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pros: lovemydog Apr 2015 #1
that is not a fact. It's a projection from the most biased of sources. n/t cali Apr 2015 #35
Cons: lovemydog Apr 2015 #2
This would be much easier if it wasn't SECRET.... pipoman Apr 2015 #3
LOL, very true! lovemydog Apr 2015 #9
Obstacles: lovemydog Apr 2015 #4
This is one of the major reasons I stand against the TPP davidpdx Apr 2015 #29
It also reminds me of how the music industry lovemydog Apr 2015 #33
LOL davidpdx Apr 2015 #36
Next Steps: lovemydog Apr 2015 #5
They Haven't Honored The "Pros" Since NAFTA... WillyT Apr 2015 #6
I hear you WillyT. lovemydog Apr 2015 #10
The old rising tide lifts all boats arguement, except it doesn't. Corporations get rich, & workers peacebird Apr 2015 #12
What if it lifts the boats for other people in other countries? lovemydog Apr 2015 #15
Hi doglover, this is my point. Corporations are taking jobs whereever they can find the lowest pay peacebird Apr 2015 #16
Hi peacebird. That doesn't seem like a good thing to me either. lovemydog Apr 2015 #18
Note how even Indian workers here don't like how H-1B program works in this report... cascadiance Apr 2015 #27
Here they frequently live 4 to a small apartment because their wages are so low they can't afford peacebird Apr 2015 #30
Outgoing receipts are not well liked by most countries davidpdx Apr 2015 #31
That is essentially what has happened over the past 25 years. pampango Apr 2015 #32
If your boat has a hole in it Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #24
http://www.cristinagrajalesinc.com/images/upload/pieces_229_1_2.jpg blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #7
What if it actually gets more people fed, lovemydog Apr 2015 #11
What will happen is American wages will continue to stagnat or drop. Our cost of living is higher peacebird Apr 2015 #13
Thanks. The big corporations play a game of three card monty. lovemydog Apr 2015 #17
If you don't know very much about it, I'm curious about why you sound so much like a DC staffer. hedda_foil Apr 2015 #19
Please read my other posts in this thread. I'm trying to learn more about it. lovemydog Apr 2015 #21
As the treaty is secret and will remain secret after enactment Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #38
The above was written by Kimberly-Amadeo lovemydog Apr 2015 #8
Con nationalize the fed Apr 2015 #14
Highly recommended. Folks, please watch this Elizabeth Warren 8 minute clip. lovemydog Apr 2015 #20
Well, to he honest, they can sue (not necessarily win) for alleged violations of international trade Hoyt Apr 2015 #37
thanks for catapulting the propaganda. got a copy of the actual agreement to show us? nt msongs Apr 2015 #22
No I don't. Do you? lovemydog Apr 2015 #23
Good thread. Jamaal510 Apr 2015 #25
Thanks Jamaal510. I'm also trying to learn more about it. lovemydog Apr 2015 #26
Wafting between "it is good for Americans" and "Do you care more about Americans djean111 Apr 2015 #28
Well I know this. Savannahmann Apr 2015 #34
I oppose the TPP because: lovemydog Apr 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trans-Pacific Partnership...