Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 2016 may be the last time I get to vote for [View all]upaloopa
(11,417 posts)41. We aren't going to have a progressive
candidate because they can't raise enough support or money. Given that still vote for who is our candidate. To not do that is helping the repubs win
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1 It really is a long-term process, often requiring small steps. But set-backs are guaranteed
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#10
I don't think there were parties when Adams made that statement. The names of all the candidates
jwirr
Apr 2015
#25
I just realized at 73 I am likely to be in the same boat. We need to win this one on every level we
jwirr
Apr 2015
#24
Yes, I hear you. There are two goals here that both need to be met if possible. First we need to
jwirr
Apr 2015
#29
Why not wait to see what other Democrats declare, and then who actually wins
99th_Monkey
Apr 2015
#36
"I know things aren't as progressive (and) Hillary isn't as progressive as we would like"
99th_Monkey
Apr 2015
#40