Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. Of course. You don't have to be "concerned," because she did nothing illegal or wrong.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:50 AM
Mar 2015

There was no actual error--the "error" is a complete and total fraud, and comes from people who shop this story and play a game that we all know isn't true.

If this was SoS Lindsey Graham and the archivist of the US said the same thing, you know full well that:

1. The NYT would NOT have covered it;

2. The television news would not have mentioned it;

3. Anyone who brought it up would have been told "That dog won't hunt. He didn't do anything illegal."

You're apparently forgetting that she archived her emails. Everything she did was legal and proper.

GW Bush's White House destroyed FIVE MILLION emails. Where was the outrage when that happened? Anyone? Buehler? Hmmmmm? Investigation? "Gate" suffix? ZZZZzzzzzzzzz. There wasn't any of that.

Anyone who continues to play the "false equivalency" card after comparing and constrasting those two events just is not credible to my mind.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trey Gowdy’s Hillary hypo...»Reply #12