Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
11. No, why would you assume that? Do you believe they can overrule Congress?
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:24 PM
Apr 2012

Frankly, I don't like a lot of these characters, like Simpson. The issue has been pushed in lieu of taxes on the wealthy, which is wrong, and which FDR set at 90%. They've been screwing the system up so badly since Reagan, that it's all out of proportion.

The 1% or whoever one calls the boogeyman, went international or global many years ago, if they weren't always that way. When you see the familial patterns, just as we used to check into who was sitting on the interlocking directorates of the Vietnam era, it's clear that there are sections of this country and the world that have always been offlimits to the proles. Like the church, like the big estates.

It's obvious why Carlin referred to them as being in 'a club, and you ain't in it.' This is not new. A few generations of people taking for granted that the 1% was benign toward the 99% did this, and expecting their parents' sacrifice to be respected.

There really may not be a 99% as far as the levels. Many people are not in a life and death struggle and depend on government service. They are either not politically involved, are part of the system underneath the 1%, and consider it within their best interests to protect the ones who hire them.

The situation is complex, and we need to stick more to principles than to persons/personalities. IMHO. At no time did I mean to imply that we shouldn't look at all of this, just saying that's not all it is.

It's that damned elitist "education!" TheWraith Apr 2012 #1
solis is very well educated. but she wasn't born into an upper class/ruling class family. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #2
Damn that elitist-educated FDR who created Social Security! freshwest Apr 2012 #6
Yep, FDR, Frances Perkins, & many other founders were ruling class. And they were countering HiPointDem Apr 2012 #9
No, why would you assume that? Do you believe they can overrule Congress? freshwest Apr 2012 #11
the lolzcats posts didn't give a good impression, lets say. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #15
I didn't say that. I think you want something to fight about. Let's avoid that. freshwest Apr 2012 #22
I didn't see any fighting, I saw me asking a question. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #23
Nothing more to discuss, the thread has exhausted itself. Have a good evening. n/t freshwest Apr 2012 #27
which you didn't answer. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #39
We are the 1% MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #3
CORRECSHUN: WE R TEH 1%. ALL UR SOSHUL SECURITY R BELONG 2 US. freshwest Apr 2012 #4
i'm a dumb 99%er & i don't get your point. please explain clearly so us dummies will get it. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #5
It's the correct LOLZ SPEAK translation. You don't like kittehs? freshwest Apr 2012 #7
no idea what you're talking about. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #8
Did you read the post I was replying to? Not a tactic, a benign correction. freshwest Apr 2012 #12
Trustees’ Report Shows Social Security ‘Vibrant, Strong’ ProSense Apr 2012 #10
"the long-run financial challenges" MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #13
They ProSense Apr 2012 #14
The President appoints the Trustees. And *he* makes proposals: MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #17
Really? ProSense Apr 2012 #20
Of what relevance are quotes from the AFL-CIO & Sanders? The Trustees aren't saying HiPointDem Apr 2012 #18
Well, ProSense Apr 2012 #19
Your link demonstrates that the Trustees aren't saying anything like "vibrant" and "strong". HiPointDem Apr 2012 #24
First of all ProSense Apr 2012 #28
oh, baloney. The entire thrust of the Trustees report is that the program is in imminent HiPointDem Apr 2012 #29
That's ProSense Apr 2012 #30
not "my" interpretation at all, it's the obvious message of the text to anyone who's not trying HiPointDem Apr 2012 #31
It is ProSense Apr 2012 #33
There is no imminent danger. So quite obviously, I don't think anything needs to be done HiPointDem Apr 2012 #34
So ProSense Apr 2012 #35
Perhaps the conversation would improve if you stopped putting words in my mouth. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #36
OK ProSense Apr 2012 #37
i don't agree with any of that. mainly because all those actors are, in one way or another, HiPointDem Apr 2012 #38
OK ProSense Apr 2012 #40
yes, i believe all those people are misleading the public in one way or another. #1, they're HiPointDem Apr 2012 #41
What? ProSense Apr 2012 #42
The numbers on collections and outlays are verifiable. Concrete facts. The projections HiPointDem Apr 2012 #43
Geithner, Sebelius, Astrue and Blahous are awful trustees...Solis only good one joeybee12 Apr 2012 #16
On the surface looks negative marlakay Apr 2012 #21
I get your point, but "elite catholic school kids" sinks your argument like the iceberg sank Titanic Stinky The Clown Apr 2012 #25
I should have made it clear that Sebelius went to the Catholic equivalent of prep school, not a HiPointDem Apr 2012 #26
I believe in timmy the trustee.... unkachuck Apr 2012 #32
kick HiPointDem Apr 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who are the Social Securi...»Reply #11