Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HRW : CUBA [View all]Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)34. Human Rights Watch Statement on Bradley Manning Verdict
http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/08/21/human-rights-watch-statement-bradley-manning-verdict
On August 21, 2013, a US court martial at Fort Meade, Maryland, imposed a 35-year-sentence on Pfc. Bradley Manning.
The aggressive prosecution and harsh sentencing of Manning not only contrasts sharply with the total impunity of former senior US officials for torture and related abuses, but also far exceeds the sentences most democratic countries impose for public leaks of sensitive information, said Dinah PoKempner, general counsel at Human Rights Watch.
On July 30, 2013, Pfc. Bradley Manning was convicted of 20 of 22 counts by a US court martial in Fort Meade, Maryland, for leaking thousands of government documents to the online publisher Wikileaks for public dissemination. The military judge, Col. Denise Lind, acquitted Manning of the most serious charge, aiding the enemy. The cumulative charges could amount to 136 years of prison time for Manning. The sentencing phase of his trial will begin on July 31.
The governments charge that Manning aided the enemy set a chilling precedent, by threatening leakers with prosecution on treason-like charges for any communication to the media that could be thought useful to an adversary. Under this charge, the government did not have to show that Manning actually intended to harm the United States. Rather, the judge ruled, the government only had to prove that Manning would have reason to believe that publishing the information via Wikileaks could potentially aid an enemy such as al-Qaeda, which (like the rest of the public), has Internet access.
The only other case in which a soldier has been prosecuted for indirectly aiding the enemy was in 1863, against a Civil War private who was sentenced to three months hard labor for giving a military roster to a newspaper, which printed it. The court declined to dismiss the charge on July 18, for lack of evidence once the government had presented its case, but apparently found the government failed to establish the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. This result, while positive, still leaves a threat of prosecution alive for those who leak information to the media without any actual intent to aid the enemy.
On August 21, 2013, a US court martial at Fort Meade, Maryland, imposed a 35-year-sentence on Pfc. Bradley Manning.
The aggressive prosecution and harsh sentencing of Manning not only contrasts sharply with the total impunity of former senior US officials for torture and related abuses, but also far exceeds the sentences most democratic countries impose for public leaks of sensitive information, said Dinah PoKempner, general counsel at Human Rights Watch.
On July 30, 2013, Pfc. Bradley Manning was convicted of 20 of 22 counts by a US court martial in Fort Meade, Maryland, for leaking thousands of government documents to the online publisher Wikileaks for public dissemination. The military judge, Col. Denise Lind, acquitted Manning of the most serious charge, aiding the enemy. The cumulative charges could amount to 136 years of prison time for Manning. The sentencing phase of his trial will begin on July 31.
The governments charge that Manning aided the enemy set a chilling precedent, by threatening leakers with prosecution on treason-like charges for any communication to the media that could be thought useful to an adversary. Under this charge, the government did not have to show that Manning actually intended to harm the United States. Rather, the judge ruled, the government only had to prove that Manning would have reason to believe that publishing the information via Wikileaks could potentially aid an enemy such as al-Qaeda, which (like the rest of the public), has Internet access.
The only other case in which a soldier has been prosecuted for indirectly aiding the enemy was in 1863, against a Civil War private who was sentenced to three months hard labor for giving a military roster to a newspaper, which printed it. The court declined to dismiss the charge on July 18, for lack of evidence once the government had presented its case, but apparently found the government failed to establish the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. This result, while positive, still leaves a threat of prosecution alive for those who leak information to the media without any actual intent to aid the enemy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not to mention our own HR record. What happens to protesters HERE. See Ferguson and
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#54
The U.S. government has routinely tortured those it detains. So long as Bush and Cheney walk
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#59
The same is true of China and probably Vietnam but that doesn't stop us from working with them.
craigmatic
Dec 2014
#3
where are your posts demanding we suspend relations with dozens of other countries
CreekDog
Dec 2014
#46
Yeah, if we'd just maintained that embargo against Cuba for one more decade....
Paladin
Dec 2014
#12
Yes, it's really that overdue; that being from 2002 makes it worse
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2014
#30
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that in all probability. No one gives a shit whether
Guy Whitey Corngood
Dec 2014
#37
Isn't there an OP you could start about some Muslim doing some fucked up shit somewhere? nt
Guy Whitey Corngood
Dec 2014
#39
My point is that seems to be the sole purpose of this poster. He seems to have added commies
Guy Whitey Corngood
Dec 2014
#55
"Life goes on. A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms. Enthusiasms...
Guy Whitey Corngood
Dec 2014
#64
I'll do that when you point me out to people who post about nothing else but that. nt
Guy Whitey Corngood
Dec 2014
#66
Who else is there to reply to when trying to ignore facts being pointed out?
Violet_Crumble
Dec 2014
#62
Are you implying that normalising relations with Cuba is a bad thing?
Donald Ian Rankin
Dec 2014
#40