General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is George Zimmernan refered to as "Zimmerman"... [View all]Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)You're either playing stupid or you really are, I can't tell which. I kinda feel sorry for you, but I'm quickly losing interest.
However, I will make a challenge to you. You're now accusing me of not giving Martin the benefit of the doubt - no proof, just an accusation. Just making stuff up and running with it.
Here's the challenge - prove that accusation with quotes, in context, and links to back it up. Offer some proof of that assertion.
I won't hold my breath.
Btw, while you were busy twisting my words and reading all sorts of bs into them, I found this...Sound familiar?
----------------
CreekDog:
I explain to you what I said 100 times and you are telling me what I really said?
that's ridiculous. you don't agree with me, and that's your right. but something in you decides that you have to tell me that I think something worse or different than I said --though I've been perfectly willing to explain myself and what I think.
you accuse me of some other meaning in my words, when I always post on these issues at DU and have done for years.
there is no hidden agenda --though you accuse me of one of trying to justify racism, which I didn't do and don't approve of.
don't tell me about reality --it's you that's trying to make my posts into something they aren't. that's YOU distorting reality.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002526765#post84
----------------
Turns out you're a hypocrite too, eh CD? It was that thread that got under your skin, wasn't it? People, myself included, called you out for your silliness and you didn't like it, hence the witch hunt. That's it, isn't it? Poor guy.
Oh well, on to the challenge. Will you back up your words with proof? Will you show me not giving Martin the benefit of the doubt? "We'll" be *yawn* waiting...