Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:40 PM Dec 2014

Deal Reached To Avert Shutdown (repeals Dodd-Frank provision) [View all]

Deal Reached To Avert Shutdown

In a rare Saturday session Congress finally did it.

The Senate passed the $1.1 trillion government funding bill (a.k.a. the CRomnibus) late Saturday night in a vote of 56-40.


The bill now heads to President Barack Obama's desk where he's expected to sign it.

<...>

But earlier in the week Democrats also had their own resistance to the bill as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) made a serious push to remove a provision rolling back aspects of Dodd-Frank. That effort failed.

- more-

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/senate-saturday-session-omnibus-bill


‘Enough is enough’: Elizabeth Warren’s launches fiery attack after Congress weakens Wall Street regs

Mr. President, I’m back on the floor to talk about a dangerous provision that was slipped into a must-pass spending bill at the last minute to benefit Wall Street. This provision would repeal a rule called, and I’m quoting the title of the rule, “PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES.”

<...>

Mr. President, I’m back on the floor to talk about a dangerous provision that was slipped into a must-pass spending bill at the last minute to benefit Wall Street. This provision would repeal a rule called, and I’m quoting the title of the rule, “PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES.”

On Wednesday, I came to the floor to talk to Democrats, asking them to strip this provision out of the omnibus bill and protect taxpayers.

On Thursday, I came to the floor to talk to Republicans. Republicans say they don’t like bailouts either. So I asked them to vote the way they talk. If they don’t like bailouts, then they could take out this provision that puts taxpayers right back on the hook for bailing out big banks.

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/12/12/enough-is-enough-elizabeth-warrens-fiery-attack-comes-after-congress-weakens-wall-street-regulations/

A few questions:

1) "Slipped" into the bill?

2) How many people knew that the bailout prohibition was part of Dodd-Frank? (Also, it's good to see people acknowledging that the law has merit.)

3) Why didn't Democrats (who voted against the current bill and most claim to oppose the repeal) do more to strengthen the law before this?

4) What now (especially with Repubicans taking full control of Congress)?

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right now, I'm a Hillary supporter. MohRokTah Dec 2014 #1
She good, but she was not successful at all yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #7
Who cares about all this banking stuff? treestar Dec 2014 #2
I care about it, and even more about the precedent of giving in to extortion. Jim Lane Dec 2014 #8
Think of the population in general treestar Dec 2014 #9
Yeah, I know right? That 2008 banking shit didn't hurt ANYBODY...... socialist_n_TN Dec 2014 #10
But Obama supports it and that's all that is needed for some. neverforget Dec 2014 #11
No, you're trying to insult people's intelligence. Cha Dec 2014 #24
The population in general will suffer from this bill AND from the precedent. Jim Lane Dec 2014 #17
They' should've gotten out and voted for Democrats treestar Dec 2014 #33
" The average person could not care less about banking regulations"... tkmorris Dec 2014 #18
And with that, the cell door slammed shut. Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #21
And I care about it like millions of others. This banking stuff is the same as the junk they peddled appalachiablue Dec 2014 #15
Thats not going to happen again treestar Dec 2014 #32
It's not going to happen again? You're in the minority. Trillions in unregulated high risk appalachiablue Dec 2014 #34
People who lose every thing when the economy crashes again will care. RiverLover Dec 2014 #30
It won't treestar Dec 2014 #31
The upside to this travesty Ruby the Liberal Dec 2014 #3
4) What now (especially with Repubicans taking full control of Congress)? this one answers itself belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #4
Good question, what are we going to do now. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #5
I am sure you are quite a fan Aerows Dec 2014 #13
Still trying huh. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #16
I'm unclear Aerows Dec 2014 #19
Some people just have to butt in & give their venomous pot shots when others are happy to see Cha Dec 2014 #25
The repealed provision was not yet in effect is thst right? Only one bank had moved the derivative Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #6
Oh, you are back Aerows Dec 2014 #12
a lot anger towards an OP which is pretty neutral JI7 Dec 2014 #14
Projecting and being rude and obnoxious.. Yes, ProSense made an OP. Poster needs to get over herself Cha Dec 2014 #26
Nice to see you, ProSense Hekate Dec 2014 #20
What's the latest update on Snowden? Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #22
I saw this at 4 AM... sheshe2 Dec 2014 #23
Mahalo ProSense.. thank you.. sorry about the obnoxious insulting spews.. looks like that will Cha Dec 2014 #27
K&R ... wish Senator Warren had more power laserhaas Dec 2014 #28
Same here. For all I care she could be called Queen Elizabeth informally. appalachiablue Dec 2014 #35
I'm sure this is the first at many tries to chip away at Dodd-Frank until it is dust davidpdx Dec 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Deal Reached To Avert Shu...