Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
23. Folks with a limited capacity for morality as well as empathy
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 05:44 PM
Dec 2014

Appear to consider war crimes and torture to be on the same level as parking tickets or rude behavior, things to "get over" as they are just "things folks do sometimes". Such folks feel we shouldn't be disgusted by, outraged over, or sanctimonious about such mistakes when they are made by some other folks, after all, sometimes even patriots do such things.

Those that worship folks with those limited capacities because of their office, or their dreamy smile simply don't understand why those of us that are fully functioning human beings with a normal capacity for morality and empathy may consider war crimes and torture heinous offenses that should be punished as the prosecutable international crimes that they in fact are.

They think we are making a big deal out of nothing, they have fallen to amorality.

or "who could have imagined...." nt grasswire Dec 2014 #1
Indeed. hifiguy Dec 2014 #2
You said what I felt Mira Dec 2014 #4
Yeah I know sharp_stick Dec 2014 #5
A 'stupid phrase?' markpkessinger Dec 2014 #9
He chooses his words very carefully -- he is a lawyer. nichomachus Dec 2014 #30
And that.... daleanime Dec 2014 #33
Exactly. This wasn't misspeaking. nichomachus Dec 2014 #35
Here's the real question you should be asking. 'How can ANYONE sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #44
yeah, he knew heaven05 Dec 2014 #48
x2 The Great Pretender. RiverLover Dec 2014 #14
It's come to that. hifiguy Dec 2014 #18
I've been saying for several years now . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #59
Well it would have been sharp_stick Dec 2014 #3
How about . . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #6
exactly!! wavesofeuphoria Dec 2014 #7
You hit the bull's eye, sir. hifiguy Dec 2014 #8
Bingo deutsey Dec 2014 #10
Thank you for this comment and the OP. (nt) enough Dec 2014 #12
There was already an investigation sharp_stick Dec 2014 #13
The decision not to prosecute . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #16
You're probably right sharp_stick Dec 2014 #19
..."right -after- he was elected." So much we learned right after, but not before. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #20
Just as we eventually learned that he told the banksters hifiguy Dec 2014 #29
"The Long Con is out in the open now"--undeniably true!! RiverLover Dec 2014 #32
I realized that we, as an electorate, had been had hifiguy Dec 2014 #34
This was my exact same experience as well. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #60
Rec! RiverLover Dec 2014 #17
Thread win. WilliamPitt Dec 2014 #21
And that's it said well Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #22
Folks with a limited capacity for morality as well as empathy Dragonfli Dec 2014 #23
Bravo! Hear, hear! - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #24
Exactly! Owl Dec 2014 #26
Thank you. woo me with science Dec 2014 #27
Yeah, but since we're still torturing people . . . . nichomachus Dec 2014 #31
But when you are playing your part in a cover-up, you have to be careful what you say. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2014 #39
Indeed Oilwellian Dec 2014 #40
durec PowerToThePeople Dec 2014 #43
The Obama administration has made it no secret he is not that fond of liberals. I have to wonder liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #51
K&R WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #65
Unfortunate turns of phrase are jumped on by malicious minded cons and trolls...et tu, "liberals"? Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #38
I could dismiss it as an "unfortunate turn of phrase" IF .... markpkessinger Dec 2014 #50
What "lecture" was that? By calling whatever speech that was a lecture, are you not being the judgmental Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #53
Call it a lecture, call it an admonishment, call it whatever you will ... markpkessinger Dec 2014 #55
It was entirely deliberate. GeorgeGist Dec 2014 #66
Leaders don't make stupid comments. They make comments calculated sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #45
I know, right? iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #11
"Not prosecuting the torturers undermines the rule of law." Dragonfli Dec 2014 #25
I agree that it's not just agencies and see your point. iscooterliberally Dec 2014 #68
I thought you might enjoy that post Dragonfli Dec 2014 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Dec 2014 #15
It was an "unpleasant experience" and "ugly little episode." joshcryer Dec 2014 #28
I thought you were going to say, "Heck of a job, Brownie!" nt justiceischeap Dec 2014 #36
me too. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #42
Hitler had Issues Derek V Dec 2014 #37
No, no, no. The President using the words "we tortured..." is not anywhere BootinUp Dec 2014 #41
It's not a fair comparison at all rep the dems Dec 2014 #46
The rhetorical distancing in this instance . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #54
You can argue that the "folksiness" is in bad taste rep the dems Dec 2014 #57
Not in my mind it isn't.. not even fucking close.. but, whatever keeps the rabid Cha Dec 2014 #56
It isn't just about the word "folks" . . . markpkessinger Dec 2014 #70
I didn't like the "we" implicating we are all responsible. Many Cleita Dec 2014 #47
America dragged into a moral sewer. woo me with science Dec 2014 #49
"out of the loop"...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #52
I cringed when he said that. Blue_In_AK Dec 2014 #58
At least Obama didn't use the passive voice to obscure who was doing the torture. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #61
He should have been far more precise imo. I took 11 years to get to that moment. Rex Dec 2014 #62
Some folks. BeanMusical Dec 2014 #63
We sodomized some folks until they died. JEB Dec 2014 #64
K and R bigwillq Dec 2014 #67
A rare instance where this President was tone-deaf. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"We tortured some fo...»Reply #23