General Discussion

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)

12. I voted to hide. It wasn't personal. And if admins would make locking BS RW sites part of hosts' job

Mon Sep 8, 2014, 02:11 PM

Sep 2014

it could get locked without dinging your hidden post rating.

I am FUCKING SICK of people linking to dubious RW sites here. You're not sure of the source? Click on the site's homepage and take 15 seconds to glance around.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I would like offer my apology .... [View all] mylye2222 Sep 2014 OP

John Kerry & Mrs. Clinton either or both VP and Pres. be fine with me. Disagree with you, but you Sunlei Sep 2014 #1

No. I cannot vote over here. mylye2222 Sep 2014 #2

not at all, you're welcome to post your opinions. Just expect answers on a messageboard. Sunlei Sep 2014 #3

Ok nt. mylye2222 Sep 2014 #5

The jury was wrong, there's nothing wrong with using a RW source if the story is valid. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #4

You beat me to it. + infinity stevenleser Sep 2014 #10

Sometimes I can't believe there are enough idiots on DU to do things like that Warpy Sep 2014 #54

There have been times that I've tried to find a Non-RW source for a story or video clip, and failed. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #55

Some of us think that using RW sources is "intellectual laziness". PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #56

Big (((hug))) NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #57

back atcha PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #62

Sure hope you get through this... Agschmid Sep 2014 #60

I've been here for ten years and I don't recall ever seeing a listing of 'banned sites". postulater Sep 2014 #6

Never saw it either! mylye2222 Sep 2014 #7

There is no list of banned sites. That was a bad hide because it was a factual story. Autumn Sep 2014 #8

I dont mind that much you know. . mylye2222 Sep 2014 #11

I think if people don't like a source nothing is stopping them from finding another source Autumn Sep 2014 #13

I have that list but it is no longer in use. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #30

Yes. Is tgat the one board mylye2222 Sep 2014 #33

Yup. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #39

Not only sad lives. mylye2222 Sep 2014 #51

That was one of the more ridiculous hides I have ever seen. stevenleser Sep 2014 #9

It was to townhall...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #58

I voted to hide. It wasn't personal. And if admins would make locking BS RW sites part of hosts' job PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #12

That's what I was looking for. You must have the list. postulater Sep 2014 #14

As I said, "Click on the site's homepage and take 15 seconds to glance around." PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #17

Thanks, I'll look at that. postulater Sep 2014 #19

Are those sites vetted and the ones under the left wing tab would be good sites? Autumn Sep 2014 #22

If you have a hard time recognizing obvious RW BS, that's a shame. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #28

Please cite the particular DU rule that backs up your vote to hide the post. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #32

Community standards. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #35

In other words, you got nothin'. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #36

lol, kthxbai! PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #37

It's a violation of community standards. Gormy Cuss Sep 2014 #38

That's why the jury system is bullshit. There are no rules, just emotions. NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #42

Community standards are however our current "rules" Gormy Cuss Sep 2014 #43

You linked the site and I just asked if the sites listed had been vetted. Autumn Sep 2014 #45

It's a Wiki page. Are you relatively new to the internet? There is research and links with PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #50

No I'm not new to the internet. I have seen some posters say that Wiki Autumn Sep 2014 #52

Neat! PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #53

I'm eternally grateful that you are here to protect us from ideas hootinholler Sep 2014 #64

I thought he was asking for DU banned website list? notadmblnd Sep 2014 #34

I'd imagine a collective effort to collate the obvious would be rather simple LanternWaste Sep 2014 #18

Yep. That could be a powerfull solution nt. mylye2222 Sep 2014 #44

Here's a pretty good list wyldwolf Sep 2014 #40

Your post was alerted. Results coming...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #20

WTF? For what? PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #21

?? leftstreet Sep 2014 #26

Jury left it 4-3... SidDithers Sep 2014 #27

lol, hey alerter (I think s/he is in this thread): PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author mylye2222 Sep 2014 #23

I think he served on the jury and is telling me it was alerted on. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #24

I didn't alert. I was on the jury... SidDithers Sep 2014 #25

You were juror number 1? Gormy Cuss Sep 2014 #41

Curses. Foiled again... SidDithers Sep 2014 #49

So you didn't watch the video? You just hid it????? Really???????????? yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #65

I don't understand why the person alerted on your post m-lekktor Sep 2014 #15

while the alert was already sent mylye2222 Sep 2014 #16

I've done that MORE than once including LBN :-( Omaha Steve Sep 2014 #29

If the same information is posted on a more reputable site, use that instead eridani Sep 2014 #46

Agree. Agschmid Sep 2014 #48

That was a terrible hide. onyourleft Sep 2014 #47

No need to apologize friend. Rex Sep 2014 #59

Exactly. I think people forget why RW sites can be an issue and this one was not one of those stevenleser Sep 2014 #61

OP is a huge Kerry supporter. Rex Sep 2014 #66

I didn't see it... NaturalHigh Sep 2014 #63

Yes. no REAL NEED to apology mylye2222 Sep 2014 #67

I held my nose and voted for him once...I will not do it again. nt abakan Sep 2014 #68