General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm done, too. [View all]BainsBane
(53,035 posts)you focus on a parenthetical statement as a means of deflection. That link to Seabeyond clearly shows you equate "feminists" with right-wingers. The fact is you do not pay attention to the substance of arguments and for that reason you refer to them as "censorship" and make irrelevant points about "right-wing science of porn." You insist porn and prostitution are valid choices but ridicule separatists sexual choices and the theories they articulate in relation to that choice.
You use feminists in quotes similarly in an entry in your journal that I cannot link to because the forum is not public access. It is in fact a common tactic used by some around here to disparage feminists, often HOF members. http://www.democraticunderground.com/111411793#post7
http://www.democraticunderground.com/111411793#post15
Edit: from you
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11147468
Here you describe "actual" feminists from others who don't focus on the stuff you think they are supposed to
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1114&pid=6777
Again: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1114&pid=2560
What would we do without you to tell us what "actual" feminism is and what we are allowed to care about without being deemed a not- "actual" "feminist"?
Of course there is no such thing as patriarchy. Men declaring what real feminism is just . . .what exactly?
As for digging around in two year old stuff, they turned up at the top of the page when I used the search bar above. Naturally you want to deny that it had anything to do with you since it was two years ago. More deflection, and more of refusal to engage.