Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michael Brown, Ferguson Victim Paid For His Rellos [View all]Logical
(22,457 posts)134. Well, then you are biased! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
198 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you think any of the so-called altercation might be about Brown's age to buy
R B Garr
Aug 2014
#46
This makes a lot of sense! Great analysis. That seemed like a disagreement rather than
R B Garr
Aug 2014
#178
I've read that the clerk at the counter who handed him the Swisher Sweets
aint_no_life_nowhere
Aug 2014
#2
I believe per police report, the friend put what he was handed back on the counter.
Shrike47
Aug 2014
#101
If he knew why didn't he stop him and ask about a robbery instead of stopping him for walking in the
kelliekat44
Aug 2014
#52
Now, they are saying Wilson did not know Brown was a suspect when he first saw him.
Hoyt
Aug 2014
#127
No, it was not. The initial release only showed the shoving match, not the part at the counter. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#26
Yes it was. I guess it just depends on where you saw the video. I saw the entire exchange on Friday.
cui bono
Aug 2014
#28
The initial release showed only Brown and Johnson entering the store and then the
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#41
Cool. I mentioned on Friday, after the extended video surfaced, that it looked like maybe
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#49
And that was done, IMO, to assassinate Brown's character by a PD steeped
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#65
And another thing for sure is that Dorian Johnson put that box back on the counter
cui bono
Aug 2014
#94
Weird. I'm on the west coast and I was watching video of the conference that had happened while I
cui bono
Aug 2014
#42
I think the confrontation with the clerk was not a clear-cut case of robbery but something
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#47
Yes. Or Brown felt he was the one being cheated and took what he felt had had...
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#62
Good catch, winter. I had not thought of that! Quite possible, indeed! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#83
That varies by state. I think the age for tobacco in Missouri is 18. n/t
winter is coming
Aug 2014
#133
If there was no theft, the store owner wasn't justified in confronting Brown at the exit
aint_no_life_nowhere
Aug 2014
#19
Yeah. We can't tell what happened, and unfortunately for Brown it doesn't matter
cui bono
Aug 2014
#30
Look behind Brown as he straightens up from picking up the cigarello packages off the floor...
JimDandy
Aug 2014
#173
If he handed his the tobacco prior to getting age verification then an infraction was committed.
bravenak
Aug 2014
#179
I wonder if the clerk refused to sell him cigars because he didnt have an ID
Travis_0004
Aug 2014
#141
So, it appears that Brown was involved in a small altercation at the store
Live and Learn
Aug 2014
#33
Someone yesterday posed the question: if Brown's hands were full of cigars (or 'rellos'), then how
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#86
Umm, his friend who was there with him and also on the video has admitted that they stole them
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#48
By the law, it is "Strong Arm Robbery" or second degree theft because of the assault
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#55
So pushing the guy out of his way so he could leave, is considered 'strong arm' robbery?
Rex
Aug 2014
#67
Yep. I saw people turn a fine and maybe CS hours and turn it into years in jail
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#85
"Shopkeepers Privilege"- a store owner or clerk CAN keep you from leaving if they suspect theft
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#79
Well most reasonable people udnerstand the law is what it says, not what you want it to be
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#97
Well the officer that allegedly shot and killed Brown had no idea of the robbery at the time he
Rex
Aug 2014
#71
I doubt this even rises to the level of a criminal assault and battery
aint_no_life_nowhere
Aug 2014
#129
Something really fishy about this. Is that video of the same incident? What was in Brown's hands
kelliekat44
Aug 2014
#58
Schema, that's EXACTLY what I wanted to know.... HOW THE HELL did the person
Ecumenist
Aug 2014
#190
I find that hard to believe because they NEVER mention that although they talk about what
Ecumenist
Aug 2014
#192
If he paid could that be why the Police Chief presented then discounted the video?
gordianot
Aug 2014
#64
The LAW has never mattered to cops who are bent on getting a conviction...
countryjake
Aug 2014
#125
With your attitude, I doubt you'll ever serve on a jury. You seem very confused.
Starboard Tack
Aug 2014
#117
You would send an 18 year old to prison for 5 years for what we see in that video?
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#107
If you don't think he deserves the minimum for Robbery 2, then you don't think it's Robbery 2
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#113
Of course he wouldn't, but the charge on the incident report is Robbery 2
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#147
You're not going to get an assault charge if there was a wrongful attempt to detain Brown
aint_no_life_nowhere
Aug 2014
#108
If a shopkeeper is pushed aside by someone who turns out to be innocent of theft
aint_no_life_nowhere
Aug 2014
#123
Dorian Johnson could easily provide the answer as to whether they had a problem with ID
JimDandy
Aug 2014
#185
He is interacting with the clerk, they are clearly having a discussion. Then, at :19,
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#80
grabbed numerous packs of Swisher Sweets and turned to the leave the store. [redacted] calls “911”.
w4rma
Aug 2014
#155