Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Derangement Syndrome about her Presidency begins 30 months early [View all]betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)13. Oh you mean you can't attack them for stupid shit after the fact either
like if they appoint bankers and neocons and stuff. BTW, it is also innappropriate to try and prevent them from getting nominated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Derangement Syndrome about her Presidency begins 30 months early [View all]
stevenleser
Jul 2014
OP
I thought people were ridiculous with Obama, attacking him just after his election for appointments
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#2
That's because they're full of themselves; I know some would rather lose to the GOP
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#80
It's a free country. You can do whatever silly stuff you want. And I will call you on it. nt
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#23
Let 'em go at it then. I have ZERO tolerance for the GOP. If they did burst a blood vessel
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#78
I have no clue who I will support in the Illinois primary 20 months from now...
greatauntoftriplets
Jul 2014
#4
Yes, they're deranged. Their already projecting foreign policy choices and imputing GOP support
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#8
There was opposition to the warrantless wiretapping, guess what it was changed in 2008, ordered
Thinkingabout
Jul 2014
#102
My, how nice to be able to just snap your fingers like that and make your words true!
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#150
Actually, you believe Warren would be weak and taken advantage of by the "neocon dominated DC...
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#15
but your concern is war with Iran. A good economic policy has little to do with that
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#22
So? The fact is you posted 'concern' about Iran and said Warren would be taken in by neocons
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#27
you're avoiding the question - PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#50
Making things up as you go. Now PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#57
Yeah, he DID. For breaking international law. Now prove Obama is seeking revenge on Putin
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#85
More conspiracy theorist arguments. You're really contending Assad didn't gas his people?
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#119
oh who knows? When you replied with something incoherent, the obvious conclusion was you were...
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#133
Advices the president on economic matters - which doesn't mean the banks run things
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#90
that's your opinion and it still doesn't prove the banks set US economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#99
Public opinion? Really? You have evidence the public believes banks set US economic policy?
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#103
You're claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works?
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#114
You're seriously claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works.
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#118
So, you're seriously claiming that Sen. Durbin isn't an expert on how our government works.
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#121
And you did feel the need to point out that Rand Paul would never pick a fight with Iran. Even in
Squinch
Jul 2014
#30
Gee Manny, if only you could spend a bunch of time rubbing elbows over at FOX news, you could
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#42
You got it all wrong, you get to use as many facts as you want, as long as you make them up
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#123
The Bieberette types always appeared deranged to me as well, but apparently hero worship is just
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#44
Lefties like that are constantly stuffing the right's straw men with more straw. nt
conservaphobe
Jul 2014
#31
Yeah! How DARE she criticize a Dictator whose regime uses chemical weapons on its citizens...
brooklynite
Jul 2014
#95
He's not "buying in." He's pointing it out and if it works for him, fine with me. nt
MADem
Jul 2014
#101
the first one comes off as someone making fun of the things Catherina/Tiniore would post
JI7
Jul 2014
#87
Where's the "sexist" part? Hillary is a crappy, neolib, 3rd Way, candidate who voted for war.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#125
This thread represents a new low. It's just pathetic, and reflects much more poorly
Romulox
Jul 2014
#131
Oh, so now it is "Hillary's Presidency"? Bit of hubris there, or trying to influence expectations
djean111
Jul 2014
#151
Next hit will be Vince Foster, Monica and the blue dress... Oops, that one's being linked, too.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#158