General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Greenwald weighs in...telling us to read Kennedy's concurrence, noting that Ginsburg is incorrect [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)And the OP is "ardently" against the NSA spying machine. That's why her entire career here is devoted to discrediting and smearing anyone who challenges the Stasi and defending anything it does. That's up to and including gleeful smearfests like this OP, *and* implying deliberate falsehoods about the law, as in this thread where she really, really tried to insinuate, without directly claiming it, that NOT extending the FISA court order for data collection would be illegal or unconstitutional: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025134715 . Now that's shamelessness and dishonesty well beyond the amateur leagues from someone who claims to be a lawyer.
But you know what is the saddest thing of all about this? The chocolate ration crap, and the 2+2=5, and the constant, ugly smear jobs, and the utterly ludicrous denials like you just attempted?
There are more reputable occupations. The TISA hasn't destroyed them all yet (although check again in a few years...). There are ways to earn a living that don't require the gutting of conscience and human decency.
There really, really are.