Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Once more, the SCOTUS proves why important to have DEMOCRATIC presidents... [View all]n2doc
(47,953 posts)17. Shame the Senate Dems never did the right things
One can bet that if the Repubs take over the senate in 2015 and an opening on the USSC comes up, they will never allow Obama to appoint a Judge.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Once more, the SCOTUS proves why important to have DEMOCRATIC presidents... [View all]
MrScorpio
Jun 2014
OP
I was just saying I wish Gore had fought like it was his life, this doesnt happen if W isnt allowed
randys1
Jun 2014
#4
Yes, what exactly was going to compel a Republican Florida Governor and legislature to keep counting
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#40
The case to resolve the outcome of the election didn't stem from Nader "helping" Bush
MrScorpio
Jun 2014
#24
It was not incompetence, it was deliberate, very deliberate. It went way beyond ballots and counts,
Zipgun
Jun 2014
#50
Gore screwed up in more than one way, but Nader does not get off free in my book.
Zipgun
Jun 2014
#54
No they're not, despite what stupid shit they say. When it comes down to it,
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#11
Tolerating what? Their first choice not being Hillary or saying they're not going to vote?
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#41
You, too, can rack up 11,000 posts by flaming fellow Democrats in every thread!
beerandjesus
Jul 2014
#68
Who has worked to blur the lines between Democrats and Republicans for 20 some years now? nt
Romulox
Jun 2014
#20
That is exactly right. It's never OK to vote third party or refuse to vote for the Dem nominee. nt
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#23
If she is the nominee and you don't, then you don't care about women's rights for starters...
stevenleser
Jun 2014
#32
Agree. Primaries should be used for a spirited debate. Not a coronation. n/t
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#55
Nah! People too busy blaming and hating the black guy in the White House. Hate trumps logic
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2014
#38