Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Sun May 4, 2014, 12:00 AM May 2014

Obama's Crony Capitalism will Kill Net Neutrality. New FCC Staff in Bed with ISPs [View all]

Former Comcast and Verizon Attorneys Now Manage the FCC and Are About to Kill the Internet

By Lee Fang

Under the new proposed system, companies such as Comcast or Verizon will be able to create a tiered Internet, in which websites will have to pay more money for faster speeds, a change that observers predict will curb free speech, stifle innovation and increase costs for consumers.

Like so many problems in American government, the policy shift may relate to the pernicious corruption of the revolving door. The FCC is stocked with staffers who have recently worked for Internet Service Providers (ISP) that stand to benefit tremendously from the defeat of net neutrality.

The backgrounds of the new FCC staff have not been reported until now.

Take Daniel Alvarez, an attorney who has long represented Comcast through the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. In 2010, Alvarez wrote a letter to the FCC on behalf of Comcast protesting net neutrality rules, arguing that regulators failed to appreciate “socially beneficial discrimination.” The proposed rules, Alvarez wrote in the letter co-authored with a top Comcast lobbyist named Joe Waz, should be reconsidered.

Today, someone in Comcast’s Philadelphia headquarters is probably smiling. Alvarez is now on the other side, working among a small group of legal advisors hired directly under Tom Wheeler, the new FCC Commissioner who began his job in November....

MUCH MORE DISGUSTING DETAIL AT LINK
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What a predatory disaster this presidency has turned out to be, woo me with science May 2014 #1
No more predatory than most -- but more demoralizing that he's gone the route of corruption Armstead May 2014 #2
You'd only know how wrong you were, if you took courses in politics. The "Iron Triangle". TheBlackAdder May 2014 #3
Tip MFrohike May 2014 #4
Who the fuck do you think appoints the officials in executive agencies like the FCC? Armstead May 2014 #6
Nice language. The president nominates then, but the Senate confirms them. TheBlackAdder May 2014 #11
(Sorry for the language. I was worked up.) I agree that it all comes down to money but... Armstead May 2014 #14
I often wonder why he nominates the people he does. They often seem like the enemy from jwirr May 2014 #18
net worth oneofthe99 May 2014 #25
I like the phrase "enemy within". Less folksy sounding than "fox in the hen house". GoneFishin May 2014 #27
If you're rich or an Insider you're smarter than the rest of us mere mortals Armstead May 2014 #34
+1 a whole fucking bunch. Enthusiast May 2014 #20
Sadly you are wrong. Phlem May 2014 #5
Unlike Mary Poppins who was only "practically perfect in every way". Dragonfli May 2014 #7
Is it a coincidence moondust May 2014 #8
No. woo me with science May 2014 #9
The Industry Crooks are making a grb for it all -- and Obama is helping them Armstead May 2014 #15
But just wait until his second term--then his true liberal self QC May 2014 #21
HA! SammyWinstonJack May 2014 #31
More like his true Corporate Self, from the way things are going Armstead May 2014 #33
This type of activity is what drove the college students to Ron Paul tiredtoo May 2014 #10
Unfortunately I agree -- This is not behavior that will cause people to flock to vote for D's Armstead May 2014 #16
I suspect that is part of the objective. Enthusiast May 2014 #22
yep. then the white house will blame those disgusted voters for the loss Doctor_J May 2014 #28
Please explain in detail Vattel May 2014 #12
You are channeling a corporate lawyer and fox news "guest" liberal Dragonfli May 2014 #13
I hope you're being facetious. Armstead May 2014 #17
K&R! Curbing free speech is the objective. Enthusiast May 2014 #19
and enriching the 1% even more Doctor_J May 2014 #29
after the demise of "commercial-free pay television" (lol) back in the early days of cable librechik May 2014 #23
poll on how the BOG will treat this Doctor_J May 2014 #24
3)Ignore it because it is so outrageously awful there is no defense of it Armstead May 2014 #30
4) Launch of the indisputable emoticons. raouldukelives May 2014 #35
You're using one of the favorites Armstead May 2014 #36
Well, isn't that special! City Lights May 2014 #26
rec SammyWinstonJack May 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Crony Capitalism ...