Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Huey P. Long

(1,932 posts)
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 02:16 PM Dec 2011

Federal Reserve Bank Researchers Proposed Bailing out 99%, Action not taken [View all]

Federal Reserve Bank Researchers Proposed Bailing out 99%, Action not taken

For Immediate Release: Federal reserve bank researchers proposed plan to save people from foreclosure, and through them the banks and the financial system. Action not taken by government.

CAMBRIDGE, MA December 20, 2011 - The US government saved the "too big to fail" banks in 2008. The reason? People were unable to pay their mortgages causing the banks billions in losses. The US Government authorized $700 billion to save the banks. The Federal Reserve Bank also gave them short-term loans that were even larger.

According to a report of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, there was another way. Why not save the people who were at risk? If the people were helped, they would be able to pay their mortgages, the banks would not have needed to be rescued and the financial crisis would have been considerably less severe. The cost? They calculated up to $50 Billion dollars overall - less than 10% of what was approved for banks.

Refined variants of the proposals that the researchers have worked on would reduce the amount to just $1 billion dollars, the interest cost of deferred payments, which could be paid either by borrowers or servicers.

The Treasury decided to bail out the banks instead. At the time the US Treasury Secretary was Henry Paulson, previously Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the investment bank Goldman Sachs.

full-
http://necsi.edu/news/2011/bailouts.html

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Toto? -- i don't think we're in a Democracy any more. nt xchrom Dec 2011 #1
I wonder who else is a Goldman Sachs puppet? -eom Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #2
sadly, i think the list would be long. nt xchrom Dec 2011 #3
Well, I'm thinking of whose campaign they gave most to. -eom Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #9
I have a request tavalon Dec 2011 #21
oh sure. xchrom Dec 2011 #22
Thank you tavalon Dec 2011 #23
Not surprised atreides1 Dec 2011 #4
+1 redqueen Dec 2011 #5
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth Dec 2011 #6
"We the People" needs to be stricken everyplace and changed to "We the Corporations." It's now RKP5637 Dec 2011 #7
Many DU members suggested the same approach at the time. ms.smiler Dec 2011 #8
Thats because it made the most perfect sense and preserved the middle class. There was no profit Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #11
Yep it would have preserved the status quo hootinholler Dec 2011 #14
That approach would have been directed at the real problem. The banksters and the corporations jwirr Dec 2011 #18
our millionaire presidents & congresspersons take care of their friends first nt msongs Dec 2011 #10
true statement. -eom Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #17
THANK GOD IT PASSED! SammyWinstonJack Dec 2011 #12
Say it often, say it LOUD. -eom Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #13
Sadly, I'll bet they didn't do this because they didn't want homeowners to think Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #15
Seems to me the only job of congress and the Fed is to keep ultra rich people, ultra rich. fasttense Dec 2011 #16
Bailing out the 99% wouldn't make the banks rich...which joeybee12 Dec 2011 #19
Exactly. Cause the disaster through criminality, then cash in again on the 'fix'. Huey P. Long Dec 2011 #25
The banks were too deep in the red to save them via saving the 99% it seems L. Coyote Dec 2011 #20
In fairness, Obama did try to bail out the homeowners. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2011 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Reserve Bank Rese...