General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Man with the Secrets is the Most Powerful Human in History. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)By Paul M. Barrett
Bloomberg Businessweek March 24, 2014
Justice Antonin Scalia signaled during a law school talk on March 21 that the Supreme Court is very much aware that legal challenges to the National Security Agencys domestic surveillance programs are headed toward the high courtand he, for one, thinks the cases will be intriguing.
The courts most voluble member, an unabashed entertainer who jokes that he wants to do nasty conservative things, seemed fascinated by a question he got from an audience member at an unusual session sponsored by Brooklyn Law School. In the context of controversy over the constitutionality of various NSA domestic spying initiatives, the questioner wondered whether Scalia considered data stored on computer drives to be the sort of effects covered by the Fourth Amendments protection against unreasonable government searches.
Ooh, Scalia responded, obviously tickled. Ooh, he repeated. The justice declined to elaborate, implying he didnt want to prejudge the issue. His cryptic response, though, indicated admiration for the acuity of the inquiry. The American Civil Liberties Union, Senator Rand Paul, and others have filed a series of suits challenging NSA activities revealed by former agency contractor Edward Snowden. The suits invoke the Fourth Amendment, which states:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Scalia addressed a wide range of topics during a 90-minute question-and-answer for Brooklyn Law School students and alumni. The symposium was orchestrated by Andrew Napolitano, a former New Jersey state court judge who serves as a legal analyst on the Fox News Channel, teaches at Brooklyn Law, and is a friend of Scalias. Among the justices other quips and observations:
+ He has never discussed legal philosophy in any depth with his colleagues on the Supreme Court. Scalia scorned the commonly held idea that the justices engage in heavy jurisprudential debates when they gather for their private weekly conferences. By the time they reach the high court, he added, justices are too set in their thinking to revisit basic questions of constitutional interpretation or philosophical outlook.
CONTINUED...
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-03-24/nsa-spying-case-at-the-supreme-court-ooh-says-scalia
PS: Tony the Fixer helped get a whole world of dead cat into the picture.