Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 10:20 AM Dec 2011

Study: Why Teen Pot Smoking Could be a Good Thing (And What We Can Learn From Teens Who Choose Weed [View all]

http://www.alternet.org/story/153498/study%3A_why_teen_pot_smoking_could_be_a_good_thing_%28and_what_we_can_learn_from_teens_who_choose_weed_over_beer%29/

Study: Why Teen Pot Smoking Could be a Good Thing (And What We Can Learn From Teens Who Choose Weed Over Beer)

The National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) released the results of its 2011 Monitoring the Future Survey of teen drug use, and guess what: Teens are using cigarettes and alcohol less, but they are smoking more marijuana. What's more, they're smoking more weed because they do not perceive it to be as harmful as did teens in the past. Teens' level of "associated risk" with marijuana use has gone done over time, and marijuana is, indeed, less harmful than alcohol and cigarettes: This could be an argument for more honest drug education in schools.

Associated risk is the danger or harm believed to be a consequence of drug use. If associated risk for a particular substance goes up, more people are reporting that they consider using that drug to be a threat. In other words, as associated risk goes down, more people are saying the drug in question is not that bad. According to the NIDA study, a decline in marijuana's associated risk contributed to teens smoking more pot, while drinking less alcohol and smoking fewer cigarrettes. Thus, many teens actually showed good judgement, by using available information to determine the danger posed by particular substances, and making smart decisions accordingly.

According to the study, about 25% of teens surveyed said they tried marijuana at least once last year, a statistically significant rise of about 4% since 2007. Additionally, 6.6% of 12th graders also admitted to smoking weed daily.
120 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
as a parent, my bad, i just can't get all outraged at pot. seabeyond Dec 2011 #1
toking is better for the mind and body any day then getting drunk ensho Dec 2011 #2
I guess if they have to abuse some substance, better weed than tobacco or booze, but.... NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #3
I take issue... Bigmack Dec 2011 #4
Thank you for taking issue with this. My reply was going to be that I seemed SammyWinstonJack Dec 2011 #6
I hope I don't have to include a disclaimer for something as frakking obvious as exceptions... NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #9
While we're delineating "exceptions" pscot Dec 2011 #27
There are plenty with metabolic disorders nebenaube Dec 2011 #54
Opium RobinA Dec 2011 #12
I regularly smoked weed for years hifiguy Dec 2011 #14
Get a vape. Use it. Don't look back. You'll be better than fine. woofless Dec 2011 #42
I enjoy the fullness of a bong hit tatfreak79 Dec 2011 #62
Vape? What's a vape? n/t emcguffie Dec 2011 #94
Nature gave us endogenous receptors for cannabinoids. Q.E.D. WheelWalker Dec 2011 #48
nature doesn't give everyone a fair shake, just as society doesn't hand out food or shelter to all. bettyellen Dec 2011 #5
"My body, my choice" doesn't apply here? nt Romulox Dec 2011 #8
Sure, self mutilation included. nt NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #10
That's a grotesque response with no bearing on the subject at hand. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #30
IMO, inhaling the smoke from burning leaves is much like self-mutilation. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #100
Most prohibitionists try to hide their *morality* behind a medical argument. You've barely bothered. Romulox Dec 2011 #104
Most addicts will do anything to support their weak argument... nt NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #105
Marijuana is not addictive. SCIENCE > NYC_SKP's moralizing. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #106
A substance free life > using artificial stimulants. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #107
A subject change is in order, eh, NYC_SKP? A concession would've won you more credibility. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #108
Weak. It's scientifically accepted that pot is not physically addictive. Feel better? NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #109
Seems dishonest to snipe with a point you know isn't true, then. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #110
I totally agree. Chemisse Dec 2011 #13
+1 dmr Dec 2011 #20
I remember some very potent weed (one toke)back in the sixties. I think American growers are alfredo Dec 2011 #47
Those kids might ruin their lives--unless we JAIL THEM! Romulox Dec 2011 #7
lol. Yeah, it makes so much sense, doesn't it? chrisa Dec 2011 #67
I chose reefer. And I haven't had regular Migraine headaches since. MjolnirTime Dec 2011 #11
as I noted before RainDog Dec 2011 #115
It doesn't matter if pot is less dangerous to injest than tobacco. randome Dec 2011 #15
JAIL THEM! FOR THEIR HEALTH! Romulox Dec 2011 #16
Incarceration is the wrong answer. I know that. randome Dec 2011 #17
You defend the status quo, you defend incarceration for a victimless crime. It's that simple. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #18
No, I'm saying we should not encourage young people to harm themselves. randome Dec 2011 #19
Unfortunately, the science doesn't support your position. But keep telling us about your daughters! Romulox Dec 2011 #31
Does science support the idea that ingesting smoke is GOOD for people? randome Dec 2011 #32
I agree tatfreak79 Dec 2011 #64
The science is not with you on this. Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #88
The poster did no such thing. pnwmom Dec 2011 #53
She's posting this "I don't support the War on Drugs--but I *understand*!" routine in several Romulox Dec 2011 #75
So I can multitask. randome Dec 2011 #77
Yours is the type of position I can least respect: a Helen Lovejoy type schtick in which you can't Romulox Dec 2011 #80
I bet you're really "concerned" that's there's no test for stoned driving, too. Even though science Romulox Dec 2011 #81
Many States already do not incarcerate, yet it is still illegal. None of those States Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #89
PS--the word "if" was implied in my statement. It's idiomatic English: ("You mess with the bull, Romulox Dec 2011 #78
Vaporizers put NO smoke into your lungs... and edibles, too. Bigmack Dec 2011 #22
Great. randome Dec 2011 #25
My daughter keeps trying to tell me how to describe this kind of response. emcguffie Dec 2011 #95
Red Herring musiclawyer Dec 2011 #38
Not a red herring at all when the OP is about smoking pot. randome Dec 2011 #40
So vaporize already! No excuse for actually smoking it these days n/t eridani Dec 2011 #57
I grow weary of the "smoking" argument. Oldenuff Dec 2011 #58
You can find a study that supports anyone's position on this. randome Dec 2011 #74
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!" Romulox Dec 2011 #76
Focus. randome Dec 2011 #79
The science indicates that marijuana use is negatively correlated with cancer. Deal with it. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #83
I can deal with any information, no matter how unsettling it might be to me. randome Dec 2011 #85
You're a self-styled "expert" who hasn't read the major studies. That's the problem. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #87
I think what he was saying that marijuana is bad for cancer. Not that it causes it. emcguffie Dec 2011 #96
randome never read that study, and therefore is saved the trouble of forgetting it. Romulox Dec 2011 #84
((facepalm)) name remoovvved Dec 2011 #21
As a HS teacher, I saw a lot of 16yr olds that needed medication.... Bigmack Dec 2011 #23
We need to uncover the stressors rather than cover them up name remoovvved Dec 2011 #26
Holy shit...! Were you ever young..? Bigmack Dec 2011 #44
maybe not teaching civics is a good thing... nebenaube Dec 2011 #55
Good one... IthinkThereforeIAM Dec 2011 #71
"If I had discovered pot while in high school, I never would have graduated"-attributed to Joe Walsh IthinkThereforeIAM Dec 2011 #72
'...what we can learn...?' randome Dec 2011 #24
I'm inclined to agree pscot Dec 2011 #28
I think that different people have different responses. hifiguy Dec 2011 #34
But most people don't. randome Dec 2011 #35
And you take that opinon of others from where? Can you cite any support for that? Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #90
I agree. Further, I submit that THC often makes one careless, goofy, silly, and stupid. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #29
careless, and stupid no reggie the dog Dec 2011 #39
Your experience is not everyone's. randome Dec 2011 #41
Here is my not so limited expreience reporting that marijuana users I know include Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #91
I'm with you, but to others apparently if there are exceptions then you're argument is a failure. NYC_SKP Dec 2011 #102
i managed all A's and B's reggie the dog Dec 2011 #36
my own life experiences correspond to what this article describes reggie the dog Dec 2011 #33
Every time I ever fucked up in my life Bennyboy Dec 2011 #37
LMAO nt rbnyc Dec 2011 #70
Teens should not smoke or vape until they are older musiclawyer Dec 2011 #43
Alcohol problems might not be related to an "addictive personality" as much as pnwmom Dec 2011 #51
No offense, but AA tells people that religion is the key to sobriety. This is not science. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #86
AA refers to a "higher power" but that power isn't necessarily God. pnwmom Dec 2011 #98
OK. But that's not science. nt Romulox Dec 2011 #99
When Sobriety isn't an option... MrScorpio Dec 2011 #45
As a parent of 3 teenagers... trumad Dec 2011 #46
Pot smokers have an almost doubled rate of being involved in fatal car crashes. pnwmom Dec 2011 #52
More driving stoned = More death Fearless Dec 2011 #56
Thats interesting...I found a study that says the opposite.. Oldenuff Dec 2011 #59
As I pointed out earlier in this thread... randome Dec 2011 #61
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2011 #49
The people I've known with problems did both pot and alcohol. pnwmom Dec 2011 #50
increased risk of triggering psychosis.... tomp Dec 2011 #60
We've discussed that, at length, as a "Chicken & Egg" argument. DCKit Dec 2011 #66
in the study i read.... tomp Dec 2011 #103
here's a link to 5 different studies RainDog Dec 2011 #113
thanks. i'm all for being scientific about this. tomp Dec 2011 #118
thanks RainDog Dec 2011 #119
how to effectively discourage drug use? tomp Dec 2011 #120
Hmmm. Pot really disagrees with me. Horribly. emcguffie Dec 2011 #97
No, even if legal, it is not a "good thing" treestar Dec 2011 #63
Use -vs- Abuse. progressoid Dec 2011 #68
I don't think daily use of any recreational drug is a good thing, especially for teenagers Nikia Dec 2011 #101
That sounds AWFUL: " You can feel happy spending time smoking pot with people..." Romulox Dec 2011 #111
I disagree with a police state and the war on drug as much as you Nikia Dec 2011 #116
I grow tired of the "I disagree with the drug war, but..." type arguments. The greatest harm Romulox Dec 2011 #117
A quote to consider from an American treasure: Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #92
If we had JAILED! Louis early enough, he wouldn't have wasted his time on all of that "jazz". Romulox Dec 2011 #112
My favorite PSA tatfreak79 Dec 2011 #65
teens should not be smoking and drinking ThomThom Dec 2011 #69
on a tuesday night Lance_Boyle Dec 2011 #73
I know! They might grow up to be....PRESIDENT!!!! Romulox Dec 2011 #82
"When I was a kid I inhaled frequently. That was the point." Bluenorthwest Dec 2011 #93
Anything that can cause teenage boys to drive slower HillWilliam Dec 2011 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: Why Teen Pot Smoki...