Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)54. You make many claims, but you don't to be able to support them.
This piece is well-researched, and backed by clear science, and a clear scientific consensus.
Noting that, I can only wonder why you would make such adamant claims that don't match with the reality of the piece.
Hmmmmm.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Organic Shmorganic -- Conventional fruits and vegetables are perfectly healthy for kids. [View all]
HuckleB
Feb 2014
OP
I imagine accuracy in labeling may be perceived as a fear-mongering tactic
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#44
A reason to go "organic" is that is uses less resources (energy and water).
progressoid
Feb 2014
#10
Please explain how the post in that link is in any way "back to the real world,"
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#57
You seem to have a habit of obfuscating and trying to put words in people's mouths,
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#65
She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support.
HuckleB
Feb 2014
#82
"She posted the usual personal attack BS, and made claims that she couldn't support."
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#84
I've come to the considered conclusion you're just trolling at this point. n/t EOF
Denzil_DC
Feb 2014
#90
Oh, small things, like pesticides really are deadly poison and highly destructive to critical
Zorra
Feb 2014
#55
When you find something that clearly isn't multinational corporate propaganda, I'll be impressed.
Zorra
Feb 2014
#67
Thank you for doing the background check - it never occurred to me that the author
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#125
Look up super weeds, which are actually a big problem. The fact that GMO pushers seem to be ignorant
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#110
NYT and Nature says GMOs are responsible. Ignorance doesn't mean "facts I don't like"
Chathamization
Feb 2014
#123
When studying something, oftentimes you can only determine the presence or absence of
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#40
Not by independent scientists. Corporations that control the patents control the studies
Berlum
Feb 2014
#49
Funny, I thought this was a left wing political site, not a Big Pharma/Farm site. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#83
Very true. But the existence of the atomic bomb demonstrates that sometimes science-based evidence
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#95
The article is an excellent example of bait-and-switch use of data to support a
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#51
I'm sure it is the same science that said tobacco was safe for you. I'll use the logic of its poison
Pisces
Feb 2014
#97
HuckleB you are most likely dealing with people who are convinced that neem oil
MattBaggins
Feb 2014
#126
For all intents and purposes your brilliant op is essentially a comments section
whatchamacallit
Feb 2014
#117
pesticide contamination of land and water never seems to be at issue in these discussions
G_j
Feb 2014
#124
My posting was in no way meant to collect all the recent studies on the subject
hedgehog
Feb 2014
#148
If you really are pro-science you're not doing science any favors with your posting style
Fumesucker
Feb 2014
#134