Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
6. I'm confused as to what they'd need balistics for
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 04:32 AM
Mar 2012

Zimmerman admitted it was his gun and that he shot Trayvon with it. Certainly there were all kinds of mistakes made by the police in the case (if "mistakes" they really are). But there isn't any issue as to what gun was used, who it belonged to and who shot Trayvon. So I don't get what they would have needed the gun for as far as ballistics in concerned. As far as the police are concerned he lawfully defended himself, and there was no reason to arrest him. So why would they confiscate his gun?

I think it's pretty clear that the police weren't making any mistakes. For whatever reason they chose to believe Zimmerman's story of lawful self defense even with all the evidence to the contrary and even went out of their way to "correct" witnesses statements to fit that scenerio. This was no series of unconnected mistakes... it was a calculated effort by the police to protect a murderer who committed an obvious homicide. Of course they wouldn't confiscate the gun. What for? They were calculatedly acting in Zimmerman's best interests despite the obvious. The question is why, and THAT also needs investigating.


Oh wow! qanda Mar 2012 #1
Yes, they did. He was also treated, according to the report, for minor wounds. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #12
Saw nothing at the link about the case. Can you point it out? Thanks. yardwork Mar 2012 #37
That's strange. Maybe they've moved it or taken it down. Anyhow, I had a window still open so here's sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #38
OMG they didn't even try to help Trayvon until they had finished monkeying with Zimmerman! yardwork Mar 2012 #39
The other thing that stood out to me was the time between Zimmerman's call to the police and sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #41
I think the disparity in time is because Zimmerman was talking to the non-emergency dispatch. X_Digger Mar 2012 #42
Well, there is no disparity in the time. I had wondered about it, how long it took after the first sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #43
sounds like a slam-dunk case to me Syrinx Mar 2012 #2
A Florida jury found Are_grits_groceries Mar 2012 #3
Most juries are idiots. YellowRubberDuckie Mar 2012 #16
Agree...I have been on 3 juries now...most of them were dumb dumbs HipChick Mar 2012 #17
I've also served on three trial juries, and my experience differs sharply from yours slackmaster Mar 2012 #27
Same here. X_Digger Mar 2012 #30
They have no concept of the life they are ruining... YellowRubberDuckie Mar 2012 #28
As we have seen, I think shows like CSI, NCIS, Body of Proof etc. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #29
A prosecuting attorney acquaintance of mine dubbed it the 'CSI effect'. X_Digger Mar 2012 #32
Welcome to NRA America, Government can take a man's life, but not his gun.... Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #4
This is utter madness Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #5
There's a direct correlation between killing small "d" democracy, and this madness.... Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #8
I'm confused as to what they'd need balistics for TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #6
You need ballistics for several reasons... CanonRay Mar 2012 #18
Only in New Jersey are hollow-point bullets illegal for self-defense. X_Digger Mar 2012 #22
Cop Killer? OPOS Mar 2012 #26
Banned and still available at gun shows as far as I know. CanonRay Mar 2012 #35
It isn't going to matter if the gun is at the bottom of a lake now TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #34
What exactly do you mean by "cop-killer" bullets? Johnny Rico Mar 2012 #36
suppose he changes his story Enrique Mar 2012 #31
You would think he was Dick Cheney with all the breaks the cut him. nt Poll_Blind Mar 2012 #7
He can still vote and walk around, too slackmaster Mar 2012 #9
When a shooting has occurred, Are_grits_groceries Mar 2012 #10
Do you know for a fact that the Sanford police did NOT examine Zimmerman's gun? slackmaster Mar 2012 #11
I want to know what they did to or with that gun. Are_grits_groceries Mar 2012 #13
Thanks. I think you and I are substantially in agreement as to what's going on. slackmaster Mar 2012 #14
His ballot isn't potentially the principle evidence in a murder investigation. nt Romulox Mar 2012 #20
He's already admitted to the shooting. I don't see how he could change his story at this point. slackmaster Mar 2012 #24
Only one thing FlaGranny Mar 2012 #15
It's clear by now Blue_Tires Mar 2012 #19
I would be very surprised if those reports are correct ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #21
Cops guns are taken administratively. X_Digger Mar 2012 #23
Those "errors" were not accidental in any way. hifiguy Mar 2012 #25
Typical fucking cops. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #33
wowwwwwww!!! uponit7771 Mar 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wait! What?! Zimmerman ke...»Reply #6